Join the 200th Anniversary Celebration

Original Article

The Effect of Directly Observed Therapy on the Rates of Drug Resistance and Relapse in Tuberculosis

Stephen E. Weis, Philip C. Slocum, Francis X. Blais, Barbara King, Mary Nunn, G. Burgis Matney, Enriqueta Gomez, and Brian H. Foresman

N Engl J Med 1994; 330:1179-1184April 28, 1994

Abstract

Background

Tuberculosis has reemerged as an important public health problem, and the frequency of drug resistance is increasing. A major reason for the development of resistant infections and relapse is poor compliance with medical regimens. In Tarrant County, Texas, we initiated a program of universal directly observed treatment for tuberculosis. We report the effect of the program on the rates of primary and acquired drug resistance and relapse among patients with tuberculosis.

Methods

We collected information on all patients with positive cultures for Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Tarrant County from January 1, 1980, through December 31, 1992. Through October 1986, patients received a traditional, unsupervised drug regimen. Beginning in November 1986, nearly all patients received therapy under direct observation by health care personnel.

Results

A total of 407 episodes in which patients received traditional treatment for tuberculosis (January 1980 through October 1986) were compared with 581 episodes in which therapy was directly observed (November 1986 through December 1992). Despite higher rates of intravenous drug use and homelessness and an increasing rate of tuberculosis during this 13-year period, the frequency of primary drug resistance decreased from 13.0 percent to 6.7 percent (P<0.001) after the institution of direct observation of therapy, and the frequency of acquired resistance declined from 14.0 percent to 2.1 percent (P<0.001). The relapse rate decreased from 20.9 percent to 5.5 percent (P<0.001), and the number of relapses with multidrug-resistant organisms decreased from 25 to 5 (P<0.001).

Conclusions

The administration of therapy for M. tuberculosis infection under direct observation leads to significant reductions in the frequency of primary drug resistance, acquired drug resistance, and relapse.

Media in This Article

Figure 1Incidence of M. tuberculosis and Rates of Relapse, Relapse with Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis (Multidrug-Resistant Relapse), Primary Resistance, and Acquired Resistance from 1980 through 1992.
Table 1Characteristics of All Patients with M. tuberculosis Infection Diagnosed from 1980 through 1992 in Tarrant County, Texas.
Article

From 1953 to 1984, the incidence of tuberculosis in the United States declined progressively. In 1985, the trend was reversed, with an increasing number of excess cases, as compared with those predicted on the basis of the previous downward trend, reported up to the present1. Tuberculosis has reemerged as a serious public health problem, particularly in densely populated areas and among ethnic minorities1-3. Treatment of patients infected with drug-susceptible Mycobacterium tuberculosis has success rates greater than 95 percent among patients who comply with therapy4. Recent studies suggest that the use of a larger number of bactericidal antituberculous drugs is more efficient and reduces drug resistance5. Despite widespread use of such regimens, increasing numbers of patients present with primary resistance, acquire resistance, relapse, or do not complete therapy2,3,6,7.

Nonadherence to medical regimens is underestimated by physicians and is difficult to predict7-10. Demographic factors such as age, sex, race, marital status, education level, and socioeconomic status are not correlated with the degree of compliance with the medication regimen. By the time noncompliance is detected, resistance, relapse, or further spread of the infection may already have occurred11.

A review of cases of M. tuberculosis in Tarrant County, Texas, before 1986 revealed frequent relapse and acquired resistance, and noncompliance contributed substantially to these trends. To address this problem, we instituted a program in which all patients were observed while taking their prescribed medications (directly observed therapy). We then compared the outcome of standard therapy with that of directly observed therapy.

Methods

We reviewed the charts of all patients with positive cultures for M. tuberculosis in Tarrant County from January 1, 1980, through December 31, 1992, whose cases were reported by April 1993. In addition, we included children identified during investigation of contacts if they had positive skin tests with purified protein derivative and abnormal chest films suggestive of active infection. All isolates of M. tuberculosis obtained at the Tarrant County Health Department were submitted to a regional laboratory for sensitivity testing. When the initial diagnosis and cultures were performed at another institution, sensitivity patterns from that facility were used. From January 1980 through October 1986, therapy was unsupervised unless patients acquired resistance or had a relapse while receiving therapy. The regimen usually included isoniazid, rifampin, and ethambutol until information on the susceptibility of the isolate was available. Supervision was usually discontinued when the cultures became negative or after one to two months of supervision if the patient promised future adherence to the treatment regimen.

Beginning in November 1986, nearly all patients referred to the Tarrant County Health Department for treatment of M. tuberculosis infection were treated with directly observed therapy (90.5 percent). The only patients not so supervised were those who lived outside Tarrant County and those under the care of practitioners who did not wish their patients to undergo direct observation. Patients who were not directly observed when taking their medications (9.5 percent) underwent random urine screening for isoniazid, and their patterns of drug refills were monitored for adherence. If the urine sample was negative for isoniazid or the patient was irregular in picking up medication, he or she was switched to directly observed therapy.

The team administering directly observed therapy was organized within the staff of the Tarrant County Health Department and consisted of community-service aides, public health investigators, and nurses. The principal duties of the community-service aides were to transport patients to clinics, obtain information about the patients, deliver medication, and observe the ingestion of the medication by the patients. These aides had a high-school education and were trained to question the patients about drug toxicity. The public health investigators performed contact investigations and delivered medications to noncompliant patients. They also received training in drug toxicity and data collection. Nursing personnel (registered nurses and licensed vocational nurses) administered medications to patients who were receiving injectable drugs and supervised the community-service aides and public health investigators.

Therapy was dispensed and ingestion was observed in the clinic, residence, place of work, or wherever the patient preferred. Patients were treated with standard antituberculous regimens7,12-15 as prescribed by the physician at the Tarrant County Health Department. The regimens usually included isoniazid, rifampin, and pyrazinamide; most patients also received a fourth drug -- ethambutol, streptomycin, or capreomycin -- until their isolates were confirmed to be fully susceptible to the other drugs. Medications were administered under observation Monday through Friday for the first two to four weeks of therapy; weekend doses were issued each Friday but the patients' ingestion of these doses was not observed. The regimen was continued with medications given twice weekly after the initial two to four weeks. Patients with drug-sensitive M. tuberculosis underwent six months of directly observed therapy. Therapy initiated during a hospitalization was considered part of the therapeutic regimen if directly observed therapy was started immediately after discharge. Unsupervised therapy administered before the directly observed therapy or therapy that included an unsupervised period was not counted as part of the six months of observed therapy. The number of missed doses was doubled and added at the end of therapy. When patients who did not receive therapy under direct observation were identified as noncompliant, new cultures were obtained and the patients were treated with six months of directly observed therapy. Noncompliant patients were counseled by the physician and were issued a warning letter that outlined the consequences of continued nonadherence to the treatment regimen. If compliance remained poor, they were hospitalized or quarantined. Records were requested from other providers for patients who received part of their therapy outside Tarrant County. All requests for medical records were investigated to determine whether a patient had had a relapse elsewhere. If a relapse occurred, these records were obtained and included in the study data.

Definitions

A relapse was defined as a positive culture for M. tuberculosis in a patient who had previously completed an adequate course of therapy. A relapse during therapy was defined as a positive culture in a patient currently under treatment who had been culture-negative for a minimum of four months, with at least three negative cultures. A multidrug-resistant organism was defined as an isolate demonstrating resistance to at least two of the following drugs: isoniazid, rifampin, ethambutol, and streptomycin. A multidrug-resistant relapse was defined as a positive culture for multidrug-resistant M. tuberculosis in a patient in whom the definition of a relapse was met. Primary resistance was defined as resistance to one or more drugs present on the first sensitivity test for which results were available. Acquired resistance was defined as resistance that was not present on the initial sensitivity testing and that developed during or after treatment.

All clinic services, x-ray films, laboratory tests, transportation, and subsequent hospital services were free to the patients in this study. Apart from those described above, no other changes occurred in the care provided to patients with tuberculosis from 1980 through 1992.

Statistical Analysis

The data were initially analyzed by two-by-k chi-square contingency analysis, with k equal to the number of groups. If statistical significance was demonstrated, each group was analyzed with two-by-two chi-square contingency analysis with a continuity correction. To minimize time-dependent effects, data were entered according to the date of occurrence (Table 1Table 1Characteristics of All Patients with M. tuberculosis Infection Diagnosed from 1980 through 1992 in Tarrant County, Texas.). Episodes of relapse or recurrence were included in the year during which they were identified. The alpha level was set at 0.05 in this analysis.

Results

Between January 1, 1980, and December 31, 1992, there were 988 cases of M. tuberculosis. Fifteen occurred in children with active disease who were identified on the basis of clinical presentation alone during the tracing of patients' contacts. During this period there were 25 relapses during therapy. A total of 407 cases occurred in 379 patients between January 1, 1980, and October 31, 1986, and 581 cases in 578 patients between November 1, 1986, and December 31, 1992. In the latter period, 9.5 percent of the patients were receiving unsupervised therapy. The rates of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis, relapse, primary resistance, acquired resistance, and M. tuberculosis per 100,000 people in Tarrant County are shown in Figure 1Figure 1Incidence of M. tuberculosis and Rates of Relapse, Relapse with Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis (Multidrug-Resistant Relapse), Primary Resistance, and Acquired Resistance from 1980 through 1992..

The clinical and demographic characteristics of the patients are summarized in Table 1 and Table 2Table 2Clinical and Demographic Characteristics of Patients with Cases of M. tuberculosis Infection, According to Treatment.. Although the demographic data showed close similarities between the unsupervised group and the directly observed group, there were some differences. Non-Hispanic white patients made up 41.3 percent of the unsupervised group and 34.1 percent of the directly observed group (P = 0.017). Black patients made up 28.5 percent of the unsupervised group and 38.6 percent of the directly observed group (P = 0.001). The directly observed group had more patients who reported intravenous drug use (P<0.001), more patients referred from the county hospital (P = 0.015) and from prison (P = 0.02), fewer patients who owned or rented their homes (P = 0.008), more homeless patients (P = 0.006), and more patients referred from drug-rehabilitation centers (P = 0.015).

Primary Resistance

The proportion of cases with primary resistance decreased from 13.0 percent to 6.7 percent (P<0.001) after the program of directly observed therapy was implemented (Table 3Table 3Rates of Relapse and Resistance among Cases of M. tuberculosis, According to Treatment.). Primary resistance occurred between 1980 and 1986 in 10 persons who were in close contact with noncompliant patients with acquired drug-resistant M. tuberculosis. When these contacts were excluded from consideration because of their exposure, the rate of primary resistance was 10.8 percent with traditional therapy. This figure is still significantly different from the 6.7 percent rate of primary resistance in the directly observed group (P = 0.041). In the directly observed group there were no cases of primary resistance resulting from close contact with a patient with acquired resistance.

Acquired Resistance

The proportion of patients with acquired resistance decreased from 10.3 percent to 1.4 percent (P<0.001) after directly observed therapy was instituted (Table 3), and the number of episodes of acquired resistance fell from 57 to 12 (P<0.001). No patient treated with directly observed therapy from the beginning of treatment to its completion acquired resistance. Twelve episodes of acquired resistance occurred in eight patients between November 1986 and December 1992; three occurred in two patients treated from 1980 through 1986 who had relapses outside Tarrant County, two in a patient treated with unsupervised therapy in a corrections facility, two in two patients whose initial therapy was unsupervised and given outside our county, and two in a patient receiving unsupervised care at a military facility. Another two episodes occurred in a patient treated with traditional therapy outside Tarrant County in whom multidrug resistance developed and who had a relapse of disease that was resistant to two additional drugs. Finally, one episode occurred in a patient treated in another county under direct observation but with an inadequate regimen.

Relapse

The rate of relapse decreased from 20.9 percent to 5.5 percent (P<0.001) with directly observed therapy (Table 3). Only two patients who completed a full course of directly observed therapy had relapses, both more than five years after the completion of therapy. Both were homeless and alcoholic, lived in night shelters, and were at high risk for reinfection. The relation of the organisms causing the relapse to the original strain could not be determined by analysis of restriction-fragment-length polymorphisms since the original cultures were no longer available. Three patients had relapses after incomplete courses of directly observed therapy. All patients treated with directly observed therapy who relapsed had drug-susceptible organisms on repeat culture.

Multidrug-Resistant Relapse

The rate of multidrug-resistant relapse decreased from 6.1 percent to 0.9 percent (P<0.001) (Table 3). All five patients who had relapses of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis between November 1986 and December 1992 had previously received unsupervised therapy. No patient treated with directly observed therapy from the beginning to the completion of therapy had a multidrug-resistant relapse.

Discussion

The resurgence of M. tuberculosis in the United States since 1988 is well documented. In addition to the increased numbers of cases, the proportion of patients with resistant organisms has also increased,2,3 with many outbreaks of multidrug-resistant disease16-18. Drug resistance develops primarily as a result of patients' noncompliance with treatment19. It occasionally results from malabsorption of medication or an inadequate regimen7,11. Tuberculosis is unusual in that the failure to take medication as prescribed can change an easily treated infection to an untreatable disease in the patient and his or her contacts. The treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis is long, complicated, and often unsuccessful even when patients receive care as inpatients at referral centers. In one recent review of the experience at a referral center, 35 percent of the patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis had no response to treatment after a median of 7.8 months in the hospital19.

Increasing numbers of patients are not completing therapy and have either ongoing or recurrent disease2,3. Eight percent of patients treated for M. tuberculosis have multiple relapses20. Such patients typically remain infectious for long periods, contribute to the increase in the incidence of M. tuberculosis, and are more likely than others to have drug-resistant isolates. Treatment of relapses in such patients is costly11.

Noncompliance on the part of patients is the most serious remaining problem in the control of tuberculosis21 and the chief cause of relapse and drug resistance6,7. Compliance with drug treatment for M. tuberculosis has been extensively studied since the 1950s10,22. Age, sex, religion, education, race, and socioeconomic status do not predict compliance23. Psychiatric disease, alcoholism, drug addiction, substance abuse, and homelessness do predict noncompliance24,25. Nonadherence to a treatment regimen can be difficult to detect. Predictions based on interviews with patients correlate poorly with more direct measures of compliance such as pill counts and screening of urine and serum for antituberculous drugs26. Medical personnel predict compliance poorly9,10. It has been suggested that physicians should expect a 35 percent rate of noncompliance with prescribed therapy27,28.

Problems associated with the self-administration of antituberculous medications led to studies of the efficacy of therapy given intermittently12-14,29. Daily therapy for two to four weeks followed by twice-weekly therapy for a total of six months is as effective as daily therapy. Regimens without the initial two to four weeks of daily therapy, in which medications are given thrice weekly for the entire treatment period, are equally effective15. Directly observed therapy on an outpatient basis was successful in a group of patients who abused alcohol and used illicit drugs in whom unsupervised ambulatory therapy had already failed30. Despite this evidence, directly observed therapy is not widely used. Estimates from the United States suggest that at present only 10 to 12 percent of patients are treated with directly observed therapy31; worldwide, the practice is even less common. The underuse of this strategy is surprising in view of the well-known frequency of noncompliance among patients infected with M. tuberculosis. In a recent report from New York, 53 percent of patients were alcoholic, 55 percent used injection drugs, and 45 percent were homeless2; directly observed therapy is already recommended for all these groups.

There are no easy solutions to the problems of drug addiction, alcoholism, homelessness, psychiatric illness, or indifference on the part of patients, but immediate solutions to the problems of drug resistance and relapse are needed. Directly observed therapy is the only approach that guarantees effective treatment of M. tuberculosis in these difficult circumstances. Some suggest that the universal use of directly observed therapy is impractical, inefficient, and wasteful and that it undercuts a legitimate desire to individualize treatment regimens32. Others suggest that the universal application of directly observed therapy would be restrictive and intrusive and, although politically correct, is unnecessary for patients who are motivated to comply with treatment32,33.

Our data show that directly observed therapy is more effective than traditional unsupervised therapy. Among the patients we studied, implementation of a policy of using directly observed therapy for virtually all patients resulted in a decrease in the frequency of primary resistance from 13.0 percent to 6.7 percent of patients (P = 0.001) and a decrease in the proportion with acquired resistance from 10.3 percent to 1.4 percent (P<0.001). The rate of relapse decreased from 20.9 percent to 5.5 percent (P<0.001), and the rate of multidrug-resistant relapse decreased from 6.1 percent to 0.9 percent (P<0.001). These improvements occurred despite an increased frequency of intravenous drug use, homelessness, and seropositivity for the human immunodeficiency virus. We also found that when treatment with directly observed therapy was unsuccessful and patients relapsed, relapse was due to drug-sensitive organisms34 that had an excellent chance of successful retreatment.

The cost of directly observed therapy has been cited as a reason for not implementing these programs widely. Given the reductions in the rates of relapse, multidrug-resistant relapse, and acquired resistance (Table 1), our data suggest that universal directly observed therapy is not only successful but also cost effective. The cost of treating multidrug-resistant tuberculosis is high, with median hospital stays of 7.3 months in successfully treated cases and 7.8 months in cases in which treatment fails19. Hospital expenses alone may range from $100,000 to $180,000 per case,11,16 and hospital costs for a single outbreak approach $1 million16. Finally, the Tarrant County program of directly observed therapy was implemented with the same staff and support services as were present in 1980 through 1986.

To be successful, directly observed therapy must be individualized and must not be intrusive. Our patients, from all socioeconomic groups, accepted directly observed therapy after the benefits to them and to society were explained to them. Many freely admitted that during a previous infection they took medication irregularly or only until their symptoms resolved. Patients and staff members frequently developed close personal bonds. Some patients even expressed regret that they would no longer be seeing their case workers when their therapy was completed. Now that the program of directly observed therapy has been in place for more than seven years, new patients frequently ask about directly observed therapy at the initial visit.

M. tuberculosis disproportionately affects socioeconomically disadvantaged groups. Compliance with therapy is difficult to predict even though noncompliance is expected among alcoholics, drug users, the homeless, and those with psychiatric illnesses. The complications of erratic therapy are serious and affect all groups of patients. This study confirms that the universal administration of treatment under direct observation by a local health department at no cost to the patient is effective and feasible; such a program can significantly reduce the rates of primary drug resistance, acquired drug resistance, and relapse.

Supported in part by a grant (U52/CCU 600 497-11) from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

We are indebted to Dr. Thomas Beitinger of the University of North Texas for performing the statistical analysis; to Dr. Michael Iseman and Dr. John Sbarbaro for serving as consultants on universal directly observed therapy; and to Thelma McCormick for administrative assistance and assistance in the preparation of the manuscript.

Source Information

From the Research Division (S.E.W., M.N.), the Division of Pulmonary-Critical Care (P.C.S., B.H.F.), and the Division of Infectious Disease (F.X.B.), Department of Medicine, University of North Texas Health Science Center at Fort Worth; the Fort Worth-Tarrant County Health Department (S.E.W., B.K., G.B.M.); and John Peter Smith Hospital (E.G.) -- all in Fort Worth, Tex.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Weis at the Research Division, Department of Medicine, University of North Texas Health Science Center at Fort Worth, Suite 232-ME2, 3500 Camp Bowie, Fort Worth, TX 76107.

References

References

  1. 1

    Rieder HL, Cauthen GM, Kelly GD, Bloch AB, Snider DE Jr. Tuberculosis in the United States. JAMA 1989;262:385-389
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  2. 2

    Brudney K, Dobkin J. Resurgent tuberculosis in New York City: human immunodeficiency virus, homelessness, and the decline of tuberculosis control programs. Am Rev Respir Dis 1991;144:745-749
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  3. 3

    Frieden TR, Sterling T, Pablos-Mendez A, Kilburn JO, Cauthen GM, Dooley SW. The emergence of drug-resistant tuberculosis in New York City. N Engl J Med 1993;328:521-526
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  4. 4

    Combs DL, O'Brien RJ, Geiter LJ. USPHS Tuberculosis Short-Course Chemotherapy Trial 21: effectiveness, toxicity, and acceptability. Ann Intern Med 1990;112:397-406
    Web of Science | Medline

  5. 5

    Kim SJ, Hong YP. Drug resistance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Korea. Tuber Lung Dis 1992;73:219-224
    CrossRef | Medline

  6. 6

    Comstock GW, Cauthen GM. Epidemiology of tuberculosis. In: Reichman LB, Hershfield ES, eds. Tuberculosis: a comprehensive international approach. Vol. 66 of Lung biology in health and disease. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1993:23-48.

  7. 7

    O'Brien RJ. The treatment of tuberculosis. In: Reichman LB, Hershfield ES, eds. Tuberculosis: a comprehensive international approach. Vol. 66 of Lung biology in health and disease. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1993:207-40.

  8. 8

    Davis MS. Predicting non-compliant behavior. J Health Soc Behav 1967;8:265-271
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  9. 9

    Cramer JA, Mattson RH, Prevey ML, Scheyer RD, Ouellette VL. How often is medication taken as prescribed? A novel assessment technique. JAMA 1989;261:3273-3277[Erratum, JAMA 1989;262:1472.]
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  10. 10

    Dixon WM, Stradling P, Wootton IDP. Outpatient P.A.S. therapy. Lancet 1957;2:871-872
    CrossRef | Web of Science

  11. 11

    Mahmoudi A, Iseman MD. Pitfalls in the care of patients with tuberculosis: common errors and their association with the acquisition of drug resistance. JAMA 1993;270:65-68
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  12. 12

    Cohn DL, Catlin BJ, Peterson KL, Judson FN, Sbarbaro JA. A 62-dose, 6-month therapy for pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis: a twice-weekly, directly observed, and cost-effective regimen. Ann Intern Med 1990;112:407-415
    Web of Science | Medline

  13. 13

    Dutt AK, Moers D, Stead WW. Short-course chemotherapy for tuberculosis with mainly twice-weekly isoniazid and rifampin: community physicians' seven-year experience with mainly outpatients. Am J Med 1984;77:233-242
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  14. 14

    A controlled comparison of a twice-weekly and three once-weekly regimens in the initial treatment of pulmonary tuberculosisBull World Health Organ 1970;43:143-206
    Web of Science | Medline

  15. 15

    Hong Kong Chest Service/British Medical Research Council. Controlled trial of 2, 4, and 6 months of pyrazinamide in 6-month, three-times-weekly regimens for smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis, including an assessment of a combined preparation of isoniazid, rifampin, and pyrazinamide: results at 30 months. Am Rev Respir Dis 1991;143:700-706
    Web of Science | Medline

  16. 16

    Outbreak of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis -- Texas, California, and PennsylvaniaMMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1990;39:369-372
    Medline

  17. 17

    Transmission of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis among immunocompromised persons in a correctional system -- New York, 1991MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1992;41:507-509
    Medline

  18. 18

    Fischl MA, Uttamchandani RB, Daikos GL, et al. An outbreak of tuberculosis caused by multiple-drug-resistant tubercle bacilli among patients with HIV infection. Ann Intern Med 1992;117:177-183
    Web of Science | Medline

  19. 19

    Goble M, Iseman MD, Madsen LA, Waite D, Ackerson L, Horsburgh CR Jr. Treatment of 171 patients with pulmonary tuberculosis resistant to isoniazid and rifampin. N Engl J Med 1993;328:527-532
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  20. 20

    Kopanoff DE, Snider DE Jr, Johnson M. Recurrent tuberculosis: why do patients develop disease again? A United States Public Health Service cooperative survey. Am J Public Health 1988;78:30-33
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  21. 21

    Addington WW. Patient compliance: the most serious remaining problem in the control of tuberculosis in the United States. Chest 1979;76:Suppl:741-743
    Web of Science | Medline

  22. 22

    Simpson JM. Simple tests for detection of urinary PAS. Tubercle 1956;37:333-340
    CrossRef | Medline

  23. 23

    Sbarbaro JA. Public health aspects of tuberculosis: supervision of therapy. Clin Chest Med 1980;1:253-263
    Web of Science | Medline

  24. 24

    Blackwell B. Drug therapy: patient compliance. N Engl J Med 1973;289:249-252
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  25. 25

    Sumartojo E. When tuberculosis treatment fails: a social behavioral account of patient adherence. Am Rev Respir Dis 1993;147:1311-1320
    Web of Science | Medline

  26. 26

    Fox W. The problem of self-administration of drugs; with particular reference to pulmonary tuberculosis. Tubercle 1958;39:269-274
    CrossRef | Medline

  27. 27

    Haynes RB, Taylor DW, Sackett DL, eds. Compliance in health care. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1979:35-40.

  28. 28

    Sbarbaro JA. The nature of man and physician. Am Rev Respir Dis 1981;123:147-147
    Web of Science | Medline

  29. 29

    Controlled trial of 6- and 9-month regimens of daily and intermittent streptomycin plus isoniazid plus pyrazinamide for pulmonary tuberculosis in Hong KongTubercle 1975;56:81-96
    CrossRef | Medline

  30. 30

    McDonald RJ, Memon AM, Reichman LB. Successful supervised ambulatory management of tuberculosis treatment failures. Ann Intern Med 1982;96:297-302
    Web of Science | Medline

  31. 31

    Iseman MD, Cohn DL, Sbarbaro JA. Directly observed treatment of tuberculosis: we can't afford not to try it. N Engl J Med 1993;328:576-578
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  32. 32

    Annas GJ. Control of tuberculosis -- the law and the public's health. N Engl J Med 1993;328:585-588
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  33. 33

    Prager K. A PC approach to TB control. Wall Street Journal. December 30, 1992:A6.

  34. 34

    Fox W. Compliance of patients and physicians: experience and lessons from tuberculosis-II. BMJ 1983;287:101-105
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

Citing Articles (124)

Citing Articles

  1. 1

    V. Dartois. (2011) Drug Forgiveness and Interpatient Pharmacokinetic Variability in Tuberculosis. Journal of Infectious Diseases 204:12, 1827-1829
    CrossRef

  2. 2

    Mauricio Vecino, Jotam G. Pasipanodya, Philip Slocum, Sejong Bae, Guadalupe Munguia, Thaddeus Miller, Michel Fernandez, Gerry Drewyer, Stephen E. Weis. (2011) Evidence for chronic lung impairment in patients treated for pulmonary tuberculosis. Journal of Infection and Public Health
    CrossRef

  3. 3

    Chih-Bin Lin, Meng Tang, Ai-Hsi Hsu, Wei-Chieh Miu, Yeong-Sheng Lee, Jen-Jyh Lee. (2011) Pilot Study of Twice-weekly Therapy for Pulmonary Tuberculosis in Taiwan. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association 110:7, 438-445
    CrossRef

  4. 4

    E. Oren, C. A. Winston, R. Pratt, V. A. Robison, M. Narita. (2011) Epidemiology of Urban Tuberculosis in the United States, 2000-2007. American Journal of Public Health 101:7, 1256-1263
    CrossRef

  5. 5

    Sonya Shin, Maribel Muñoz, Jhon Zeladita, Sam Slavin, Adolfo Caldas, Eduardo Sanchez, Miriam Callacna, Christian Rojas, Jorge Arevalo, Jose Luis Sebastian, Jaime Bayona. (2011) How does directly observed therapy work? The mechanisms and impact of a comprehensive directly observed therapy intervention of highly active antiretroviral therapy in Peru. Health & Social Care in the Community 19:3, 261-271
    CrossRef

  6. 6

    Brady G. Case. (2011) Nonadherence: The Silent Majority. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 50:5, 435-437
    CrossRef

  7. 7

    Amr S. Albanna, Dick Menzies. (2011) Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis. Drugs 71:7, 815-825
    CrossRef

  8. 8

    I. G. Sia, M. L. Wieland. (2011) Current Concepts in the Management of Tuberculosis. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 86:4, 348-361
    CrossRef

  9. 9

    Terrence F. Blaschke, John Urquhart, Bernard Vrijens, Lars Osterberg. (2011) Understanding PK/PD Relationships During Typical Use of Medicaments: Insights from ElectronicMonitoring. Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology 52:1, 110301101444027
    CrossRef

  10. 10

    Chinazo O. Cunningham, Nancy L. Sohler, Nina A. Cooperman, Karina M. Berg, Alain H. Litwin, Julia H. Arnsten. (2011) Strategies to Improve Access to and Utilization of Health Care Services and Adherence to Antiretroviral Therapy Among HIV-Infected Drug Users. Substance Use & Misuse 46:2-3, 218-232
    CrossRef

  11. 11

    Karina M. Berg, Alain Litwin, Xuan Li, Moonseong Heo, Julia H. Arnsten. (2011) Directly observed antiretroviral therapy improves adherence and viral load in drug users attending methadone maintenance clinics: A randomized controlled trial. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 113:2-3, 192-199
    CrossRef

  12. 12

    Qin Liu, Katharine Abba, Marissa M Alejandria, Vincent M Balanag, Regina P Berba, Mary Ann D Lansang. (2010) Cochrane review: Reminder systems and late patient tracers in the diagnosis and management of tuberculosis. Evidence-Based Child Health: A Cochrane Review Journal 5:3, 1206-1245
    CrossRef

  13. 13

    Karina M. Berg, Jennifer Mouriz, Xuan Li, Elise Duggan, Uri Goldberg, Julia H. Arnsten. (2009) Rationale, design, and sample characteristics of a randomized controlled trial of directly observed antiretroviral therapy delivered in methadone clinics. Contemporary Clinical Trials 30:5, 481-489
    CrossRef

  14. 14

    Christina T. Fiske, Carol D. Hamilton, Jason E. Stout. (2009) Alcohol use and clinical manifestations of tuberculosis. Journal of Infection 58:5, 395-401
    CrossRef

  15. 15

    Philip LoBue. (2009) Extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases 22:2, 167-173
    CrossRef

  16. 16

    Fernando Alcaide, Miguel Santín. (2008) Tuberculosis multirresistente. Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica 26, 54-60
    CrossRef

  17. 17

    Robert G. Hale, David I. Tucker. (2008) Head and Neck Manifestations of Tuberculosis. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America 20:4, 635-642
    CrossRef

  18. 18

    Qin Liu, Katharine Abba, Marissa M Alejandria, Vincent M Balanag, Regina P Berba, Mary Ann D Lansang, Qin Liu. 2008. Reminder systems and late patient tracers in the diagnosis and management of tuberculosis. .
    CrossRef

  19. 19

    Ritu Banerjee, Gisela F Schecter, Jennifer Flood, Travis C Porco. (2008) Extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis: new strains, new challenges. Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy 6:5, 713-724
    CrossRef

  20. 20

    M. R. Stegemann, J. Sherington, C. Passmore. (2007) The efficacy and safety of cefovecin in the treatment of feline abscesses and infected wounds. Journal of Small Animal Practice 48:12, 683-689
    CrossRef

  21. 21

    F. L. Altice, D. S.-R. Maru, R. D. Bruce, S. A. Springer, G. H. Friedland. (2007) Superiority of Directly Administered Antiretroviral Therapy over Self-Administered Therapy among HIV-Infected Drug Users: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial. Clinical Infectious Diseases 45:6, 770-778
    CrossRef

  22. 22

    Jean-Pierre Zellweger. (2007) Treatment of tuberculosis. Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine 1:1, 85-97
    CrossRef

  23. 23

    Gregory M. Lucas, B. Anna Mullen, Mary E. McCaul, Paul J. Weidle, Shannon Hader, Richard D. Moore. (2007) Adherence, Drug Use, and Treatment Failure in a Methadone-Clinic–Based Program of Directly Administered Antiretroviral Therapy. AIDS Patient Care and STDs 21:8, 564-574
    CrossRef

  24. 24

    Q Liu, K Abba, MM Alejandria, VM Balanag, RP Berba, MA Lansang, Qin Liu. 2007. Reminder systems and late patient tracers in the diagnosis and management of tuberculosis. .
    CrossRef

  25. 25

    R. Douglas Bruce, Frederick L. Altice. (2007) Clinical Care of the HIV-Infected Drug User. Infectious Disease Clinics of North America 21:1, 149-179
    CrossRef

  26. 26

    S. S. Munsiff, C. Kambili, S. D. Ahuja. (2006) Rifapentine for the Treatment of Pulmonary Tuberculosis. Clinical Infectious Diseases 43:11, 1468-1475
    CrossRef

  27. 27

    Andréia Rosane De Moura Valim, Lia Gonçalves Possuelo, Patrícia Izquierdo Cafrune, Michele Borges, Marta Osório Ribeiro, Maria Lúcia Rosa Rossetti, Arnaldo Zaha. (2006) Evaluation and Genotyping of Multidrug-Resistant Cases of Tuberculosis in Southern Brazil. Microbial Drug Resistance 12:3, 186-191
    CrossRef

  28. 28

    Hana M. El Sahly, Larry D. Teeter, Rebecca R. Pawlak, James M. Musser, Edward A. Graviss. (2006) Drug-resistant tuberculosis: A disease of target populations in Houston, Texas. Journal of Infection 53:1, 5-11
    CrossRef

  29. 29

    T. R. Sterling. (2006) Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis in New York City: Lessons to Remember. Clinical Infectious Diseases 42:12, 1711-1712
    CrossRef

  30. 30

    G. M. Lucas, B. A. Mullen, P. J. Weidle, S. Hader, M. E. McCaul, R. D. Moore. (2006) Directly Administered Antiretroviral Therapy in Methadone Clinics Is Associated with Improved HIV Treatment Outcomes, Compared with Outcomes among Concurrent Comparison Groups. Clinical Infectious Diseases 42:11, 1628-1635
    CrossRef

  31. 31

    C. C. Whalen. (2006) Failure of Directly Observed Treatment for Tuberculosis in Africa: A Call for New Approaches. Clinical Infectious Diseases 42:7, 1048-1050
    CrossRef

  32. 32

    Seung-Kyu Park, Byoung-Ju Kim, Dong-Ohk Shin, Byung-Yool Jun. (2006) A Retrospective Study for Relapse Rate According to the Discontinuance of Para-aminosalicylic acid(PAS) after Bacteriological Conversion during the Course of Chemotherapy for Multidrug- Resistant Tuberculosis(MDR-TB). Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases 60:2, 180
    CrossRef

  33. 33

    J. W. Tappero, W. Z. Bradford, T. B. Agerton, P. Hopewell, A. L. Reingold, S. Lockman, A. Oyewo, E. A. Talbot, T. A. Kenyon, T. L. Moeti, H. J. Moffat, C. A. Peloquin. (2005) Serum Concentrations of Antimycobacterial Drugs in Patients with Pulmonary Tuberculosis in Botswana. Clinical Infectious Diseases 41:4, 461-469
    CrossRef

  34. 34

    Anbesaw W. Selassie, Carol Pozsik, Dulaney Wilson, Pamela L. Ferguson. (2005) Why Pulmonary Tuberculosis Recurs: A Population-based Epidemiological Study. Annals of Epidemiology 15:7, 519-525
    CrossRef

  35. 35

    Sandy Smith-Nonini. (2005) When “The Program is Good, But the Disease is Better”: Lessons from Peru on Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis. Medical Anthropology 24:3, 265-296
    CrossRef

  36. 36

    Leslie A. Kenna, Line Labbé, Jeffrey S. Barrett, Marc Pfister. (2005) Modeling and simulation of adherence: Approaches and applications in therapeutics. The AAPS Journal 7:2, E390-E407
    CrossRef

  37. 37

    William J. Burman. (2005) Issues in the Management of HIV-Related Tuberculosis. Clinics in Chest Medicine 26:2, 283-294
    CrossRef

  38. 38

    Thomas R. Frieden, Sonal S. Munsiff. (2005) The DOTS Strategy for Controlling the Global Tuberculosis Epidemic. Clinics in Chest Medicine 26:2, 197-205
    CrossRef

  39. 39

    Paul Van den Brande. (2005) Revised Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Control of Tuberculosis. Drugs & Aging 22:8, 663-686
    CrossRef

  40. 40

    Lauri Thrupp, Suzanne Bradley, Philip Smith, Andrew Simor, Nelson Gantz, Kent Crossley, Mark Loeb, Larry Strausbaugh, Lindsay Nicolle, . (2004) Tuberculosis Prevention and Control in Long‐Term–Care Facilities for Older Adults • . Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 25:12, 1097-1108
    CrossRef

  41. 41

    Christian Lienhardt, Jessica Ann Ogden. (2004) Tuberculosis control in resource-poor countries: have we reached the limits of the universal paradigm?. Tropical Medicine and International Health 9:7, 833-841
    CrossRef

  42. 42

    G. M. Lucas, P. J. Weidle, S. Hader, R. D. Moore. (2004) Directly Administered Antiretroviral Therapy in an Urban Methadone Maintenance Clinic: A Nonrandomized Comparative Study. Clinical Infectious Diseases 38:Supplement 5, S409-S413
    CrossRef

  43. 43

    G. Friedland, S. A. Karim, Q. A. Karim, U. Lalloo, C. Jack, N. Gandhi, W. El Sadr. (2004) Utility of Tuberculosis Directly Observed Therapy Programs as Sites for Access to and Provision of Antiretroviral Therapy in Resource-Limited Countries. Clinical Infectious Diseases 38:Supplement 5, S421-S428
    CrossRef

  44. 44

    J. A. Mitty, T. P. Flanigan. (2004) Community-Based Interventions for Marginalized Populations. Clinical Infectious Diseases 38:Supplement 5, S373-S375
    CrossRef

  45. 45

    Salim S Abdool Karim, Quarraisha Abdool Karim, Gerald Friedland, Umesh Lalloo, Wafaa M El Sadr. (2004) Implementing antiretroviral therapy in resource-constrained settings. AIDS 18:7, 975-979
    CrossRef

  46. 46

    Mark N Lurie, E Jane Carter, Jonathan Cohen, Timothy P Flanigan. (2004) Directly observed therapy for HIV/tuberculosis co-infection. The Lancet Infectious Diseases 4:3, 137-138
    CrossRef

  47. 47

    Hamisu M. Salihu, Robyn Spittle. (2003) Tuberculosis among foreign-born children in the State of Florida, 1993–1999: A re-emergence phase after a sustained decline?. Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift 115:17-18, 641-647
    CrossRef

  48. 48

    Thomas R Frieden, Timothy R Sterling, Sonal S Munsiff, Catherine J Watt, Christopher Dye. (2003) Tuberculosis. The Lancet 362:9387, 887-899
    CrossRef

  49. 49

    A. Magdalena Hurtado, Kim R. Hill, Wilhelm Rosenblatt, Jacquelyn Bender, Tom Scharmen. (2003) Longitudinal study of tuberculosis outcomes among immunologically naive Ach natives of Paraguay. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 121:2, 134-150
    CrossRef

  50. 50

    Alexander J. Stratigos, Andreas D. Katsambas. (2003) Medical and Cutaneous Disorders Associated With Homelessness. SKINmed 2:3, 168-174
    CrossRef

  51. 51

    Pentti Huovinen. 2003. Antimicrobial Resistance: Control. .
    CrossRef

  52. 52

    Gregory M. Lucas, Charles W. Flexner, Richard D. Moore. (2002) Directly Administered Antiretroviral Therapy in the Treatment of HIV Infection: Benefit or Burden?. AIDS Patient Care and STDs 16:11, 527-535
    CrossRef

  53. 53

    (2002) Rifapentine and isoniazid once a week versus rifampicin and isoniazid twice a week for treatment of drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis in HIV-negative patients: a randomised clinical trial. The Lancet 360:9332, 528-534
    CrossRef

  54. 54

    Parvathi Tiruviluamala, Lee B. Reichman. (2002) T UBERCULOSIS. Annual Review of Public Health 23:1, 403-426
    CrossRef

  55. 55

    A. ROSS HILL, VIVEK M. MANIKAL, PAUL F. RISKA. (2002) Effectiveness of Directly Observed Therapy (DOT) for Tuberculosis. Medicine 81:3, 179-193
    CrossRef

  56. 56

    Jennifer Adelson Mitty, Valerie E. Stone, Michael Sands, Grace Macalino, Timothy Flanigan. (2002) Directly Observed Therapy for the Treatment of People with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection: A Work in Progress. Clinical Infectious Diseases 34:7, 984-990
    CrossRef

  57. 57

    Mary Beth Terry, Moise Desvarieux, Margaret Short. (2002) Temporal Trends in Tuberculosis Hospitalization Rates Before and After Implementation of Directly Observed Therapy: New York City, 1988–1995 • . Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 23:4, 221-223
    CrossRef

  58. 58

    FAHAD S. AL-DOSSARY, LYDIA T. ONG, ARMANDO G. CORREA, JEFFREY R. STARKE. (2002) Treatment of childhood tuberculosis with a six month directly observed regimen of only two weeks of daily therapy. The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 21:2, 91-97
    CrossRef

  59. 59

    Masahiro Narita, Michie Hisada, Brinda Thimmappa, Jerry J. Stambaugh, Emad Ibrahim, Elena S. Hollender, David Ashkin. (2001) Reply. Clinical Infectious Diseases 33:10, 1798-1798
    CrossRef

  60. 60

    Marcia McDonnell, Joan Turner, Michael T. Weaver. (2001) Antecedents of Adherence to Antituberculosis Therapy. Public Health Nursing 18:6, 392-400
    CrossRef

  61. 61

    Henry C Mwandumba, Stephen B Squire, Henry C Mwandumba. 2001. Fully intermittent dosing with drugs for treating tuberculosis in adults. .
    CrossRef

  62. 62

    M. Narita, M. Hisada, B. Thimmappa, J. J. Stambaugh, E. Ibrahim, E. S. Hollender, D. Ashkin. (2001) Tuberculosis Recurrence: Multivariate Analysis of Serum Levels of Tuberculosis Drugs, Human Immunodeficiency Virus Status, and Other Risk Factors. Clinical Infectious Diseases 32:3, 515-517
    CrossRef

  63. 63

    David S. Jones. (2001) Technologies of compliance: Surveillance of self‐administration of tuberculosis treatment, 1956–1966. History and Technology 17:4, 279-318
    CrossRef

  64. 64

    Laurie Andrews, Gerald Friedland. (2000) PROGRESS IN HIV THERAPEUTICS AND THE CHALLENGES OF ADHERENCE TO ANTIRETROVIRAL THERAPY. Infectious Disease Clinics of North America 14:4, 901-928
    CrossRef

  65. 65

    Massimiliano Lanzafame, Marco Trevenzoli, Anna Maria Cattelan, Pierangelo Rovere, Antonino Parrinello. (2000) Directly Observed Therapy in HIV Therapy: A Realistic Perspective?. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes200-201
    CrossRef

  66. 66

    Massimiliano Lanzafame, Marco Trevenzoli, Anna Maria Cattelan, Pierangelo Rovere, Antonino Parrinello. (2000) Directly Observed Therapy in HIV Therapy: A Realistic Perspective?. JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 25:2, 200-201
    CrossRef

  67. 67

    C. R. Horsburgh, S. Feldman, R. Ridzon. (2000) Practice Guidelines for the Treatment of Tuberculosis. Clinical Infectious Diseases 31:3, 633-639
    CrossRef

  68. 68

    Stephen B. Kennedy. (2000) Developing a Self-Administered Tool to Predict Adherence to Antiretroviral Therapy: Design, Method, and Objectives. AIDS Patient Care and STDs 14:6, 309-316
    CrossRef

  69. 69

    Kim M. Blankenship, Sarah J. Bray, Michael H. Merson. (2000) Structural interventions in public health. AIDS 14, S11-S21
    CrossRef

  70. 70

    Jimmy Volmink, Patrice Matchaba, Paul Garner. (2000) Directly observed therapy and treatment adherence. The Lancet 355:9212, 1345-1350
    CrossRef

  71. 71

    Jacqueline T. Mac, Ann Doordan, Catherine A. Carr. (1999) Evaluation of the Effectiveness of a Directly Observed Therapy Program with Vietnamese Tuberculosis Patients. Public Health Nursing 16:6, 426-431
    CrossRef

  72. 72

    KAREN SOREN, LISA SAIMAN, MATILDE IRIGOYEN, CABILIA GOMEZ-DUARTE, MOSHE J. LEVISON, DONALD J. MCMAHON. (1999) Evaluation of household contacts of children with positive tuberculin skin tests. The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 18:11, 949-955
    CrossRef

  73. 73

    Pirom Kamolratanakul, Holger Sawert, Somrat Lertmaharit, Yutichai Kasetjaroen, Somsak Akksilp, Chuchai Tulaporn, Kowit Punnachest, Sunan Na-Songkhla, Vallop Payanandana. (1999) Randomized controlled trial of directly observed treatment (DOT) for patients with pulmonary tuberculosis in Thailand. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 93:5, 552-557
    CrossRef

  74. 74

    Andrew Vernon, William Burman, Debra Benator, Awal Khan, Lorna Bozeman. (1999) Acquired rifamycin monoresistance in patients with HIV-related tuberculosis treated with once-weekly rifapentine and isoniazid. The Lancet 353:9167, 1843-1847
    CrossRef

  75. 75

    Frederick L. Altice, Gerald H. Friedland, Elizabeth L. Cooney. (1999) Nevirapine induced opiate withdrawal among injection drug users with HIV infection receiving methadone. AIDS 13:8, 957-962
    CrossRef

  76. 76

    Virginia R Roth, William R Jarvis. (1999) Combating antimicrobial resistance in hospitals. Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets 3:1, 73-88
    CrossRef

  77. 77

    Omoefe O. Abugo, Zygmunt Gryczynski, Joseph R. Lakowicz. (1999) Modulation Sensing of Fluorophores in Tissue: A New Approach to Drug Compliance Monitoring. Journal of Biomedical Optics 4:4, 429
    CrossRef

  78. 78

    J Urquhart. (1998) Pharmacodynamics of variable patient compliance: implications for pharmaceutical value. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 33:3, 207-219
    CrossRef

  79. 79

    PHILIPPA H. TRNOBRANSKI. (1998) Are we facing a `post-antibiotic era'? - a review of the literature regarding antimicrobial drug resistance. Journal of Clinical Nursing 7:5, 392-400
    CrossRef

  80. 80

    William J. Burman, Barbara L. Stone, Cornelis A. Rietmeijer, Joel Maslow, David L. Cohn, Randall R. Reves. (1998) Long-term outcomes of treatment of Mycobacterium avium complex bacteremia using a clarithromycin-containing regimen. AIDS 12:11, 1309-1315
    CrossRef

  81. 81

    C R Horsburgh. (1998) What it takes to control tuberculosis.. American Journal of Public Health 88:7, 1015-1016
    CrossRef

  82. 82

    R Bayer, C Stayton, M Desvarieux, C Healton, S Landesman, W Y Tsai. (1998) Directly observed therapy and treatment completion for tuberculosis in the United States: is universal supervised therapy necessary?. American Journal of Public Health 88:7, 1052-1058
    CrossRef

  83. 83

    M T McKenna, E McCray, J L Jones, I M Onorato, K G Castro. (1998) The fall after the rise: Tuberculosis in the United States, 1991 through 1994.. American Journal of Public Health 88:7, 1059-1063
    CrossRef

  84. 84

    Pablos-Méndez, Ariel, Raviglione, Mario C., Laszlo, Adalbert, Binkin, Nancy, Rieder, Hans L., Bustreo, Flavia, Cohn, David L., Lambregts-van Weezenbeek, Catherina S.B., Kim, Sang Jae, Chaulet, Pierre, Nunn, Paul, . (1998) Global Surveillance for Antituberculosis-Drug Resistance, 1994–1997. New England Journal of Medicine 338:23, 1641-1649
    Full Text

  85. 85

    Williamson Z. Bradford, Charles L. Daley. (1998) MULTIPLE DRUG–RESISTANT TUBERCULOSIS. Infectious Disease Clinics of North America 12:1, 157-172
    CrossRef

  86. 86

    M. K. Viljanen, B. I. Vyshnevskiy, T. F. Otten, E. Vyshnevskaya, M. Marjamäki, H. Soini, P. J. Laippala, A. V. Vasilyef. (1998) Survey of drug-resistant tuberculosis in Northwestern Russia from 1984 through 1994. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases 17:3, 177-183
    CrossRef

  87. 87

    Rita L. Ailinger, Margaret R. Dear. (1998) Adherence to Tuberculosis Preventive Therapy Among Latino Immigrants. Public Health Nursing 15:1, 19-24
    CrossRef

  88. 88

    Jean K. Fleischman, Harley E. Greenberg. (1998) Tuberculosis. Medical Update for Psychiatrists 3:1, 16-21
    CrossRef

  89. 89

    Julio S.G. Montaner, Andrew Shillington, Luis Julio Gonzalez Montaner. (1998) HIV/AIDS treatment: lessons from the tuberculosis experience. Drug Resistance Updates 1:3, 157-160
    CrossRef

  90. 90

    Craig W. Spellman, Keith J. Matty, Stephen E. Weis. (1998) A survey of drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis and its relationship to HIV infection. AIDS 12:2, 191-195
    CrossRef

  91. 91

    Linda M. Parsons, Jeffrey R. Driscoll, Harry W. Taber, Max Salfinger. (1997) DRUG RESISTANCE IN TUBERCULOSIS. Infectious Disease Clinics of North America 11:4, 905-928
    CrossRef

  92. 92

    Garland D. Anderson. (1997) Tuberculosis in pregnancy. Seminars in Perinatology 21:4, 328-335
    CrossRef

  93. 93

    H. Bergstermann, A. Rüchardt. (1997) Ciprofloxacin once daily versus twice daily for the treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis. Infection 25:4, 227-232
    CrossRef

  94. 94

    J PORTER, J OGDEN. (1997) Ethics of directly observed therapy for the control of infectious diseases. Bulletin de l'Institut Pasteur 95:3, 117-127
    CrossRef

  95. 95

    A Mushtaque R Chowdhury, Sadia Chowdhury, Md Nazrul Islam, Akramul Islam, J Patrick Vaughan. (1997) Control of tuberculosis by community health workers in Bangladesh. The Lancet 350:9072, 169-172
    CrossRef

  96. 96

    Susan T. Cookson, William R. Jarvis. (1997) PREVENTION OF NOSOCOMIAL TRANSMISSION OF MYCOBACTERIUM TUBERCULOSIS. Infectious Disease Clinics of North America 11:2, 385-409
    CrossRef

  97. 97

    Holger Sawert, Sukhontha Kongsin, Vallop Payanandan, Pasakorn Akarasewi, Paul P. Nunn, Mario C. Raviglione. (1997) Costs and benefits of improving tuberculosis control: The case of Thailand. Social Science & Medicine 44:12, 1805-1816
    CrossRef

  98. 98

    MARKUS T. PORKERT, MARK SOTIR, PATRICIA PARROTT-MOORE, HENRY M. BLUMBERG. (1997) Tuberculous Meningitis at a Large Inner-City Medical Center. The American Journal of the Medical Sciences 313:6, 325-331
    CrossRef

  99. 99

    Armando G. Correa. (1997) UNIQUE ASPECTS OF TUBERCULOSIS IN THE PEDIATRIC POPULATION. Clinics in Chest Medicine 18:1, 89-98
    CrossRef

  100. 100

    Eugene McCray, Cindy M. Weinbaum, Christopher R. Braden, Ida M. Onorato. (1997) THE EPIDEMIOLOGY OF TUBERCULOSIS IN THE UNITED STATES. Clinics in Chest Medicine 18:1, 99-113
    CrossRef

  101. 101

    Edward E. Telzak. (1997) TUBERCULOSIS AND HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS INFECTION. Medical Clinics of North America 81:2, 345-360
    CrossRef

  102. 102

    Stephen E. Weis. (1997) UNIVERSAL DIRECTLY OBSERVED THERAPY. Clinics in Chest Medicine 18:1, 155-163
    CrossRef

  103. 103

    Paula I. Fujiwara, Christina Larkin, Thomas R. Frieden. (1997) DIRECTLY OBSERVED THERAPY IN NEW YORK CITY. Clinics in Chest Medicine 18:1, 135-148
    CrossRef

  104. 104

    Anothny D. Harries. (1997) Tuberculosis in Africa: Clinical presentation and management. Pharmacology & Therapeutics 73:1, 1-50
    CrossRef

  105. 105

    Connie Hastings Drisko. (1996) Non-Surgical Pocket Therapy: Pharmacotherapeutics. Annals of Periodontology 1:1, 491-566
    CrossRef

  106. 106

    Bishai, William R., Graham, Neil M.H., Harrington, Susan, Page, Christopher, Moore-Rice, Kristina, Hooper, Nancy, Chaisson, Richard E., . (1996) Rifampin-Resistant Tuberculosis in a Patient Receiving Rifabutin Prophylaxis. New England Journal of Medicine 334:24, 1573-1576
    Full Text

  107. 107

    Sandra M. Simpkins, Carmen P. Hench, Gulshan Bhatia. (1996) Management of the Obstetric Patient With Tuberculosis. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, <html_ent glyph="@amp;" ascii="&"/> Neonatal Nursing 25:4, 305-312
    CrossRef

  108. 108

    P. Kelleher, J. Coakley, J. Anderson, J. Moore-Gillon. (1996) Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in an HIV-positive man in the United Kingdom. Journal of Infection 32:2, 153-154
    CrossRef

  109. 109

    Laura S. Inselman. (1996) Tuberculosis in children: An update. Pediatric Pulmonology 21:2, 101-120
    CrossRef

  110. 110

    Neil W. Schluger, Robert M. Lawrence, Georgeann McGuiness, Maryann Park, William N. Rom. (1996) Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in children: Two cases and a review of the literature. Pediatric Pulmonology 21:2, 138-142
    CrossRef

  111. 111

    B H Lerner. (1996) Temporarily detained: tuberculous alcoholics in Seattle, 1949 through 1960.. American Journal of Public Health 86:2, 257-265
    CrossRef

  112. 112

    Enrico Girardi, Giorgio Antonucci, Mirella Tronci, Eugenio Bordi, Giuseppe Ippolito. (1996) Drug Resistance Patterns among Tuberculosis Patients in Rome, 1990-1992. Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases 28:5, 487-491
    CrossRef

  113. 113

    Susan Kitazawa. (1995) Tuberculosis Health Education Needs in Homeless Shelters. Public Health Nursing 12:6, 409-416
    CrossRef

  114. 114

    P. Chaulet, F. Boulahbal, J. Grosset. (1995) Surveillance of drug resistance for tuberculosis control: Why and how?. Tubercle and Lung Disease 76:6, 487-492
    CrossRef

  115. 115

    H. Schütt-Gerowitt. (1995) On the Development of Mycobacterial Infections. Zentralblatt für Bakteriologie 283:2, 225-238
    CrossRef

  116. 116

    K.M. De Cock, D. Wilkinson. (1995) Tuberculosis control in resource-poor countries: alternative approaches in the era of HIV. The Lancet 346:8976, 675-677
    CrossRef

  117. 117

    A. Haase, A. Melder, H. Smith-Vaughan, D. Kemp, B. Currie. (1995) RAPD analysis of isolates of Burkholderia pseudomallei from patients with recurrent melioidosis. Epidemiology and Infection 115:01, 115
    CrossRef

  118. 118

    Frieden, Thomas R., Fujiwara, Paula I., Washko, Rita M., Hamburg, Margaret A., . (1995) Tuberculosis in New York City — Turning the Tide. New England Journal of Medicine 333:4, 229-233
    Full Text

  119. 119

    R. Bayer, D. Wilkinson, R. Bayer. (1995) Directly observed therapy for tuberculosis: history of an idea. The Lancet 345:8964, 1545-1548
    CrossRef

  120. 120

    J.E. McGowan, H.M. Blumberg. (1995) Inner-city tuberculosis in the USA. Journal of Hospital Infection 30, 282-295
    CrossRef

  121. 121

    Patel, Kalpana B., Belmonte, Romelle, Crowe, Helen M., . (1995) Drug Malabsorption and Resistant Tuberculosis in HIV-Infected Patients. New England Journal of Medicine 332:5, 336-337
    Full Text

  122. 122

    (1994) The global challenge of tuberculosis. The Lancet 344:8918, 277-279
    CrossRef

  123. 123

    Hamburg, Margaret A., , Frieden, Thomas R., . (1994) Tuberculosis Transmission in the 1990s. New England Journal of Medicine 330:24, 1750-1751
    Full Text

  124. 124

    Murray, Barbara E., . (1994) Can Antibiotic Resistance be Controlled?. New England Journal of Medicine 330:17, 1229-1230
    Full Text