Join the 200th Anniversary Celebration

Original Article

Renal Transplantation in Children — A Report of the North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study

Paul T. McEnery, M.D., Donald M. Stablein, Ph.D., Gerald Arbus, M.D., and Amir Tejani, M.D.

N Engl J Med 1992; 326:1727-1732June 25, 1992

Abstract
Abstract

Background.

Previous studies of renal transplantation in children have focused on the survival of grafts and patients. Little information is available about the cause of renal disease, the sources of donated organs, or children's growth after transplantation. The North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study was organized to identify the diseases that require transplantation and to analyze factors that affect the success of transplantation in children.

Methods.

We collected data from 73 pediatric transplantation centers from 1987 through 1990. These data included information about demographic characteristics of patients, graft function, and therapy one month after transplantation and every six months thereafter for each patient 17 years of age or younger.

Results.

Altogether, 1550 children received 1667 renal allografts during this period; 31 percent of the children were five years of age or younger. Forty-three percent of the transplanted kidneys came from a living related donor, and 57 percent from a cadaver. The two most common causes of renal disease leading to transplantation were congenital malformations of the kidneys and urinary tract (42 percent of the patients) and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (12 percent). One year after transplantation, the rate of graft survival in recipients of a kidney from a living related donor was 89 percent; it was 80 percent after three years. For recipients of cadaver kidneys, the comparable rates were 74 percent and 62 percent, respectively (P<0.001). The best growth was observed in patients who were no more than five years old at the time of transplantation. During follow-up, 79 patients died, and cancer developed in 12 patients.

Conclusions.

The most common causes of end-stage renal disease in children and adolescents are congenital malformations of the kidneys and urinary tract and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. The rates of graft survival at one and three years are better in children and adolescents who receive a kidney from a living related donor than in those who receive a kidney from a cadaver. (N Engl J Med 1992;326:1727–32.)

Media in This Article

Figure 1Graft Survival According to Source.
Figure 2Mean (±SE) Change in Standardized Height Scores for Patients with Graft Function at Each Follow-up Interval, According to Age at Transplantation.
Article

CHRONIC renal disease in children is frequently due to a congenital renal lesion, such as aplasia or dysplasia, which leads to end-stage renal disease in early infancy. Such children have retarded growth and renal osteodystrophy. Dialysis therapy tends to exacerbate renal bone disease and leads to early epiphyseal closure. To avoid this additional injury, physicians frequently prefer to perform renal transplantation as soon as possible, even before dialysis is initiated. Because of the small number of procedures performed annually at individual centers, data on the outcome of renal transplantation in children are sparse. The North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study was organized in 1987 to register and follow children up to 17 years of age in the United States and Canada who receive renal allografts. This report is based on the 1550 patients who underwent 1667 transplantation procedures that were reported to the registry during its first four years of operation (1987 through 1990).

Methods

The North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study is made up of a clinical coordinating center, a data-coordinating center, and 73 medical centers treating children with renal disease in the United States and Canada. The data for this report, compiled in February 1991, include transplantations reported during the four preceding years. Since January 1987 each allograft received by a child or adolescent ≤17 years of age at a participating center has been reported to the study registry, along with information on graft function and therapy one month after transplantation and every six months thereafter, as described previously.1 Standard univariate and multivariate statistical methods, including product—limit estimates of survival distributions, were used to analyze the data. Proportional-hazards survival models were constructed that equated an individual patient's hazard to an underlying hazard multiplied by an estimated exponentiated linear combination of risk factors. Multivariate models were scaled so that risk increased with larger values of the covariates; the relative risk for a single dichotomous risk factor is the exponentiated parameter.

Results

Characteristics of the Patients

Both the number of patients who received transplants during each of the four years and the number of transplantation procedures have decreased slightly each year since 1987, although a lag in reporting probably accounts for the small size of the 1990 group (Table 1Table 1Characteristics of Pediatric Renal-Transplant Recipients, According to Year of Transplantation.). The age, race, and sex distribution of the patients did not change significantly over time. The youngest patient who underwent transplantation was five months old. Among the patients five months to five years of age, 70 percent were boys; the sex ratio was more nearly equal in the two older age groups, which included 76 percent of the patients (Table 2Table 2Characteristics of pediatric Renal-Transplant Recipients, According to Age at the Time of Transplantation.).

The most common causes of renal failure were congenital lesions (renal dysplasia, obstructive malformations, or both) in 42 percent of the patients and glomerulonephritis in 18 percent (including focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in 12 percent). Lupus nephritis (5 percent) and hemolytic—uremic syndrome (3 percent) were rare, and only one patient had diabetic nephropathy. Of the patients 5 years of age or younger, 46 percent had congenital lesions, whereas various forms of glomerulonephritis — such as focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis, and lupus nephritis — were the most frequent causes of renal failure among those 13 to 17 years of age. Although nonwhite patients made up 31 percent of all transplant recipients, 44 percent of the patients with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis were nonwhite.

At the time of entry into the registry, 14 percent of the patients had just received their second or subsequent transplants, with a median of 46 months (range, 5 to 178) since the previous transplantation. Transplantation was used as initial therapy (without dialysis) in 22 percent of the patients; 34 percent of the transplants from living related donors and 12 percent of those from cadavers were received by such patients. The rate of transplantation as initial therapy was similar in all four age groups (≤1, 2 to 5, 6 to 12, and 13 to 17 years). Among the patients treated by dialysis, the median length of time from the initiation of dialysis to transplantation was 12 months (mean, 21). All native renal tissue was removed in 29 percent of the patients, and the existing grafts were removed in 62 percent of the patients who had undergone a previous transplantation.

Characteristics of Donors and HLA Matching

The patient's parent was the source of the allograft in 624 (37 percent) of the transplantations; in 94 (6 percent) the kidney came from a sibling or other living relative. Six of the sibling donors were under 18 years of age, and three were identical twins of the patients; the youngest of these pairs of twins was 13 years old. In 949 (57 percent) of the transplantations, the kidney was obtained from a cadaver; 39 percent of the cadaver donors were 10 years of age or younger. In the case of allografts from cadavers, 82 percent were maintained with an iced electrolyte perfusion; the cold-storage times of the grafts were at least 24 hours in 56 percent of the cases and more than 48 hours in 1 percent.

The percentage of recipients who received transfusions of blood from the donor of the allograft decreased during the four years, from 43 percent in 1987 to 19 percent in 1990. Twenty-nine percent of the patients who received kidneys from living related donors and 53 percent of those who received cadaver kidneys received more than five transfusions of blood from unidentified donors. Among the recipients of kidneys from living related donors, 87 percent had at least one haplotype match with the donor (HLA-B and HLA-DR), whereas 12 percent had only one HLA-B or one HLA-DR antigen match. Matches of all A, B, and DR alleles occurred in only 2 percent of the cases of transplantation of a kidney from a cadaver.

Medication after Transplantation

The median doses of prednisone received by the patients were 0.31 mg per kilogram of body weight per day 6 months after transplantation and 0.19 mg per kilogram per day after 30 months. The percentage of transplant recipients who received prednisone therapy on alternate days increased from 12 percent to 36 percent during the same period. There was little change in the proportion of patients who received prednisone, cyclosporine, and azathioprine at each follow-up evaluation. The dose of azathioprine was constant throughout the study period (mean, 1.7 mg per kilogram per day); the median dose of cyclosporine was 6.1 mg per kilogram per day at 6 months and 4.1 mg per kilogram per day at 30 months. The proportion of recipients of kidneys from living related donors who received triple-drug therapy at six months increased each year; 54 percent of those who underwent transplantation in 1987 and 87 percent of those who received transplants in 1990 received all three drugs. For the recipients of kidneys from cadavers, the comparable figures were 69 percent and 81 percent. The dose of each of the three maintenance immunosuppressive medications correlated positively with age and weight, although the patients who weighed less received more medication per kilogram of body weight.

One month after transplantation, 72 percent of the patients were receiving antihypertensive therapy, but this percentage decreased to 53 percent at 30 months. Similarly, 59 percent initially received prophylactic antibiotic therapy, and 31 percent continued to receive it at 30 months; such treatment was more frequent among patients who had had obstructive lesions (40 percent).

Rejection

A total of 1707 episodes of rejection (defined as the initiation of antirejection therapy or graft failure due to rejection) were reported in 966 recipients, of whom 404 had 2 or more episodes of rejection (maximum, 7). Overall, half of all transplant recipients had had an episode of rejection by 66 days after transplantation (median, 187 days for recipients of grafts from living related donors and 39 days for recipients of cadaver kidneys). At the end of the second year, 40 percent of the recipients of kidneys from living related donors and 27 percent of the recipients of cadaver kidneys had not had an episode of rejection.

The younger patients were at no disadvantage with respect to the length of time to the first episode of rejection. The perioperative use of antithymocyte globulin—antilymphocyte globulin or OKT3 monoclonal antibody was associated with a significantly longer time to the first episode of rejection among all kidney-transplant recipients, regardless of the source of the graft. The recipients of kidneys from donors five years of age or younger had a higher relative risk of rejection (1.5; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.3 to 1.6; P<0.001) than those who received kidneys from older donors; 18 percent of the recipients of kidneys from cadaver donors five years of age or younger had had no rejection episodes after one year, as compared with 35 percent of the recipients of kidneys from donors more than five years of age.

Overall, 54 percent of the episodes of rejection were completely reversed, 38 percent were partially reversed, and 8 percent ended in graft failure or death. The rates of complete reversal declined with an increasing number of rejection episodes, from 62 percent for the first episode to 30 percent when four or more episodes had occurred. Treatment with antithymocyte globulin-antilymphocyte globulin or OKT3 antibody at the time of transplantation did not affect the probability that a later episode of rejection would be completely reversed. Among the 28 patients who received OKT3 antibody at the time of transplantation and again for the treatment of an episode of rejection, 18 had complete reversal and 8 partial reversal of the rejection episode. OKT3 antibody was given during 469 (27 percent) of the episodes of rejection, and intravenous methylprednisolone during 1187 (70 percent), whereas dialysis was used during 242 (14 percent) of the episodes.

Graft Survival

Of the 1667 grafts, 378 (23 percent) failed at some time during follow-up (Table 3Table 3Causes of Graft Failure in Pediatric Renal-Transplant Recipients.). Forty-nine percent of the graft failures were caused by rejection, including 26 percent caused by acute rejection episodes. In 7 percent of the patients, recurrence of the original disease resulted in graft failure; the most common recurrent disease was focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Vascular thrombosis was the cause of graft failure in 15 percent of the cases.2

Figure 1Figure 1Graft Survival According to Source. shows the rates of graft survival in the recipients of kidneys from cadavers and from living related donors. Among recipients of cadaver kidneys, 74 percent of grafts survived at one year and 62 percent at three years; among recipients of kidneys from living relatives, 89 percent of the grafts survived at one year and 80 percent at three years (P<0.001). For patients who were two years old or younger at the time of transplantation and received kidneys from cadavers, the one-year graft-survival rate was only 46 percent. For all patients who received grafts from cadaver donors less than six years old, the two-year graft-survival rate rose only to 57 percent. Proportional-hazards analysis identified several factors that were associated with an increased risk of graft failure among recipients of cadaver kidneys (Table 4Table 4Risk of Graft Failure in Recipients of Renal Allografts from Cadavers, Based on a Proportional-Hazards Model.*). Among these children, 74 percent of those who did not undergo dialysis in the first week after transplantation had functional grafts at two years, as compared with 52 percent among those in whom a delay in graft function caused by acute tubular necrosis necessitated dialysis during the first week. Among children 2 to 17 years old who received kidneys from living relatives, the graft-survival rate for various age groups (2 to 5, 6 to 12, and 13 to 17 years) ranged from 81 to 85 percent. In those less than one year old at the time of transplantation, the two-year graft-survival rate was 71 percent. The only factor associated with an increased risk of graft failure in the recipients of kidneys from living related donors was acute tubular necrosis in recipients less than one year old (relative risk, 2.4; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.1 to 5.4; P<0.01).

Growth of Children

At the time of transplantation, the mean height for all patients was 2.2 SD below the appropriate age- and sex-adjusted mean for normal children and adolescents (z score). This deficit was comparable in both sexes, although it was greater among younger patients ( — 2.8 SD for patients ≤5 years of age) and those with previous transplantations ( — 3.2 SD). The mean height scores remained relatively constant after transplantation in all but the two youngest groups of children (Fig. 2Figure 2Mean (±SE) Change in Standardized Height Scores for Patients with Graft Function at Each Follow-up Interval, According to Age at Transplantation.). The recipients who were 1 year old or younger at the time of transplantation had an increase of 0.3 SD in height during the first 6 months after the procedure; this increase was 0.8 SD by the 12th month. Accelerated growth did not continue, however, and the z score for height changed little in subsequent months. An anticipated adolescent growth spurt or catchup growth was not observed during the three years of observation after transplantation. In particular, patients who were 13 years old or older at the time of transplantation had decreases in the mean z score. All but the youngest age group had increases of 1.0 SD in weight scores by the 12th month after transplantation. After two and three years, the mean weight values were comparable to those in normal children and adolescents.

Morbidity and Mortality

The median length of hospitalization at the time of transplantation decreased from 19 to 16 days during the study; the median stay was 2 days longer for the recipients of cadaver kidneys than for the recipients of kidneys from living related donors. The number of hospital days after the procedure was negatively correlated with the patient's age; the median hospital stay was 24 days for children 1 year old or younger, 19 days for those 2 to 5 years old, 17 days for those 6 to 12 years old, and 15 days for those 13 to 17 years old. During the first one to five months after transplantation, 58 percent of the recipients were rehospitalized (mean duration of hospital stay, nine days), 30 percent for symptoms of rejection. Bacterial infection (12 percent), viral infection (12 percent), and hypertension requiring hospital treatment (8 percent) were the other major causes of hospitalization. Both the frequency and the length of hospitalizations decreased with increasing follow-up.

Cancer developed in 12 patients, of whom 6 had a lymphoproliferative disorder, 5 sarcoma, and 1 a thyroid carcinoma. Eight of the patients with cancer died, five within a month of diagnosis. Four of these 12 patients had received more than one renal allograft.

Seventy-nine of the patients (including the 8 with cancer) died during the study period; infection was the cause of death in 32 patients. In 38 patients the graft was reported to be functioning at the time of death. Nineteen deaths occurred within 30 days after the initial transplantation during the study period, and 10 during the first postoperative week. At two years, 95 percent of the patients who received kidneys from living related donors and 92 percent of those who received kidneys from cadavers were alive (P = 0.03). Sixteen (15 percent) of the patients one year old or younger died, nine of them with functioning grafts; they accounted for 20 percent of all deaths.

Discussion

The North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study was established to study systematically the effects of renal transplantation in a large population of children and adolescents and to generate data that could ultimately improve the probability of successful transplantation in such patients. The problems of the adverse effects of immunosuppression, growth deficits, and questions about the optimal timing of transplantation surgery are apparent in our results. These observations also highlight several factors affecting prognosis that are different from those in adults.

The geometric mean hospital stay authorized for adults undergoing renal transplantation under the Medicare system of prospective payment according to diagnosis-related groups was 15.8 days in 1987—1988 and 15.4 days in 19881989.3 The median length of the hospital stay after transplantation surgery in children was 17.6 days, but the number of hospital days was negatively correlated with the patient's age; thus, the median hospital stay for transplant recipients one year old or younger was 24.5 days.

In 1989 a total of 8882 renal transplantations were performed in adults, of which 1900 (21 percent) used kidneys from living related donors.4 We found that 47 percent of the kidneys transplanted into children in 1989 came from living related donors; the comparable figure was 43 percent during the four years of this study. In 1983 through 1986, the European Dialysis and Transplant Association recorded 226 transplantations of kidneys from living related donors (20 percent) among 1105 transplantations in children.5 Whether the proportion of renal allografts from living related donors in children in North America is high because a smaller number of kidneys from cadavers are allocated to children or because of the presence of a more altruistic attitude than that in Europe is a matter for conjecture, but the high rate could be due to the knowledge that the graft-survival rate for cadaver kidneys in children has been inferior to that for kidneys from living related donors. In this study, the 89 percent graft-survival rate at one year for kidneys from living related donors decreased to 80 percent by the third year, whereas the 74 percent one-year graft-survival rate for kidneys from cadavers decreased to 62 percent at three years.

An age of two years or less in the recipient, more than 24 hours of cold storage, an age of five years or less in the donor, black race, and delayed graft function due to acute tubular necrosis were associated with a lower rate of graft survival for cadaver kidneys. Almost 40 percent of all cadaver kidneys were obtained from donors under 10 years of age, with donors from 1 to 5 years old accounting for 25 percent of all such transplants. The graft-survival rate for kidneys from cadaver donors five years of age or younger was lower and the rejection rates were higher than when the donors were older. In addition, the incidence of graft thrombosis was inversely related to the age of the donor.2 , 5 These results suggest that the current practice of transplanting kidneys from very young donors into young recipients does not lead to optimal graft survival.

At the time of transplantation, the mean height deficit for all the recipients exceeded 2.0 SD, with the youngest children having the greatest deficit. Deceleration of growth is more frequent than stable growth in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis or hemodialysis.6 , 7 The children who were one year old or younger had an acceleration of growth soon after transplantation, but this group also had the worst long-term outcome. In contrast, adolescent recipients (13 to 17 years of age) had a deceleration in growth after transplantation. Our results suggest that delaying transplantation beyond the 12th year of age for children who need a transplant is disadvantageous in terms of improvement in height. Thus, vigorous attempts should be made to allocate more kidneys to children from 2 to 12 years of age. The process of allocating kidneys from cadavers to children has been addressed by the United Network for Organ Sharing,8 which now adds points for children 10 years old and younger on the waiting list. The results of this policy are not yet available.

An additional important result that emerges from this study relates to the role of immunosuppression after transplantation. As in adults, sequential therapy after the transplantation of a cadaver kidney is increasingly popular in children. The use of multiple drugs in children increases the risk of cancer as well as that of infection, however. Of the deaths in this study group, 45 percent were attributable to infection. The increase in triple-drug immunosuppression therapy —from 52 percent of the recipients of kidneys from living related donors in 1987 to 80 percent in 1990 —indicates the need for a study of the effects of various treatment regimens (with three drugs, two drugs, or lower doses of therapeutic agents) on graft survival and patient growth.

Source Information

From the Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati (P.T.M.); the EMMES Corporation, Potomac, Md. (D.M.S.); the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto (G.A.); and the State University of New York—Health Science Center at Brooklyn (A.T.). Address reprint requests to Dr. Tejani at the NAPRTCS Clinical Coordinating Center, SUNY—Health Science Center at Brooklyn, 450 Clarkson Ave., Box 49, Brooklyn, NY 11203.

Appendix

The following institutions and investigators participated in the North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study: Akron Children's Hospital, Akron, Ohio — I. Dresner; All Children's Hospital, St. Petersburg, Fla. — J. Prebis; Arkansas Children's Hospital, Little Rock — E. Ellis; British Columbia Children's Hospital, Vancouver — D.S. Lirenman; Cardinal Glennon Hospital, St. Louis — E. Wood; Children's Hospital National Medical Center, Washington, D.C. — E.J. Ruley; Children's Hospital, Denver — G.H. Lum; Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles — P.S. Kurtin; Children's Hospital of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City — J. Wenzl; Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh — D. Ellis; Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee — H.E. Leichter; Children's Hospital, Boston — W.E. Harmon; Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio — M.I. Mentser; Children's Kidney Center, Buffalo, N.Y. — L. Feld; Children's Medical Center, Dallas — S.R. Alexander; Children's Memorial Hospital, Chicago — R.A. Cohn; Children's Renal Center, San Francisco —D.E. Potter; Children's Hospital of Michigan, Detroit — A.B. Gruskin; Children's Renal Center, Galveston, Tex. — L.B. Travis; Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland — B.H. Brouhard; Columbia–Presbyterian Medical Center, New York — M.A. Nash; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, N.C. — D.R. Wigfall; East Carolina University School of Medicine, Greenville, N.C. —R. Gray; Eastern Virginia School of Medicine, Norfolk — M.J. Solhaug; Egleston Hospital for Children, Atlanta — B.L. Warshaw; Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pa. — O.R. Oberkircher; Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore — B. Fivush; Kosair Children's Hospital, Louisville, Ky. — H. Harrison; Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, Calif. — S. Sahney-Long; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston — J.T. Herrin; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn. — D.S. Milliner; Medical College Hospital at Toledo, Toledo, Ohio — M.M. DeBeukelaer; Medical College of Virginia, Richmond —J. Foreman; Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pa. — S.J. Wassner; Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York — K.V. Lieberman; New York Hospital, New York — V. Johnson; Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland — C. Bliseld; Phoenix Children's Hospital, Phoenix, Ariz. — M. Cohen; State University of New York-Health Science Center, Syracuse — F.S. Szmalc; Seattle Children's Medical Center, Seattle — S. Watkins; St. Christopher's Hospital for Children, Philadelphia — H.J. Baluarte; St. Francis Renal Institute, Honolulu —J.E. Kusgrave; St. Louis Children's Hospital, St. Louis — B.R. Cole; Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, N.C. — W.B. Lorentz; Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, Mo. — B.A. Warady; University of Vermont, Burlington — A.P. Guillot; Tulane Medical Center, New Orleans — F.G. Boineau; University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia — T.D. Groshong; University of Miami-Children's Hospital Center, Miami — J. Strauss; University of Nebraska—Bishop Clarkson Hospital, Omaha —M.T. Houser; University of Tennessee—Le Bonheur Children's Hospital, Memphis — S. Roy, III; University of California at San Diego — S.A. Mendoza; University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Houston — S.B. Conley; University of Texas Health Sciences Center at San Antonio — S.P. Makker; University Hospital, London, Ont. — D.J. Hollomby; University of Alabama Medical Center, Birmingham — E. Kohaut; University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton — F. Barley-Urtasun; University of California at Los Angeles-CHS — R. Ettinger; University of Illinois, Chicago —E.G.John; University of Iowa Hospitals, Iowa City —J. Robillard; University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington — E. Jackson; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor — A. Sedman; University of Minnesota Hospital, Minneapolis — T.E. Nevins; University of Utah, Salt Lake City — M. Turner; University of Virginia, Charlottesville — R.L. Chevalier; University of Wisconsin Hospital, Madison — A. Friedman; Weiler/Einstein Hospital, Bronx, N.Y. —I. Greifer; Westchester County Medical Center, Valhalla, N.Y. —R.A. Weiss; Wyler Children's Hospital, Chicago — A. Aronson; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn. —K. Gaudio.

References

References

  1. 1

    Alexander SR. Arbus GS. Butt KM, et al. The 1989 report of the North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study . Pediatr Nephrol 1990;4:542–53
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  2. 2

    Harmon WE, Stablein D, Alexander SR, Tejani A. Graft thrombosis in pediatric renal transplant recipients: a report of the North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study . Transplantation 1991;51:406–12
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  3. 3

    Medicare program changes to the inpatient hospital prospective payment system . Fed Regist 1989;54:36452–589
    Medline

  4. 4

    United States renal disease data system: 1991 report. Bethesda, Md.: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, 1991. (NIH publication no. 91–3176.)

  5. 5

    Broyer M. Kidney transplantation in children — data from the EDTA Registry . Transplant Proc 1989;21:1985–8
    Web of Science | Medline

  6. 6

    Trachtman H, Hackney P, Tejani A. Pediatric hemodialysis: a decade's perspective . Kidney Int 1985;29:Suppl:S15–S22

  7. 7

    Fine RN, Salusky IB. CAPD/CCPD in children: four years' experience . Kidney Int 1985;29:Suppl:S7–S10

  8. 8

    Allocation of points for renal recipients: UNOS-Point System . UNOS Update 1990;8<6):10

Citing Articles (41)

Citing Articles

  1. 1

    Lyndsay A. Harshman, Patrick D. Brophy. (2011) PAX2 in human kidney malformations and disease. Pediatric Nephrology
    CrossRef

  2. 2

    C. Bourdeaux, A. Darwish, J. Jamart, T.T. Tri, M. Janssen, J. Lerut, J.-B. Otte, E. Sokal, J. de Ville de Goyet, R. Reding. (2007) Living-Related Versus Deceased Donor Pediatric Liver Transplantation: A Multivariate Analysis of Technical and Immunological Complications in 235 Recipients. American Journal of Transplantation 7:2, 440-447
    CrossRef

  3. 3

    J.M. Smith, D. Stablein, A. Singh, W. Harmon, R.A. McDonald. (2006) Decreased Risk of Renal Allograft Thrombosis Associated With Interleukin-2 Receptor Antagonists: A Report of the NAPRTCS. American Journal of Transplantation 6:3, 585-588
    CrossRef

  4. 4

    Vikas R. Dharnidharka. (2005) Renal transplantation: The present and the future. The Indian Journal of Pediatrics 72:9, 785-788
    CrossRef

  5. 5

    Sevgi Mir, Hakan Erdoğan, Erkin Serdaroğlu, Caner Kabasakal, Cüneyt Hoşcoşkun. (2005) Pediatric renal transplantation: Single center experience. Pediatric Transplantation 9:1, 56-61
    CrossRef

  6. 6

    A. D. Schachter, K. E. Meyers, L. D. Spaneas, J. A. Palmer, M. Salmanullah, J. Baluarte, K. L. Brayman, W. E. Harmon. (2004) Short sirolimus half-life in pediatric renal transplant recipients on a calcineurin inhibitor-free protocol. Pediatric Transplantation 8:2, 171-177
    CrossRef

  7. 7

    Ruth A. McDonald, Jodi M. Smith, Donald Stablein, William E. Harmon. (2003) Pretransplant peritoneal dialysis and graft thrombosis following pediatric kidney transplantation: A NAPRTCS report. Pediatric Transplantation 7:3, 204-208
    CrossRef

  8. 8

    Paul M. Colombani, Stephen P. Dunn, William E. Harmon, John C. Magee, Sue V. McDiarmid, Thomas L. Spray. (2003) Pediatric transplantation. American Journal of Transplantation 3:s4, 53-63
    CrossRef

  9. 9

    Jodi M. Smith, P. L. (M.) Ho, Ruth A. McDonald. (2002) Renal transplant outcomes in adolescents: A report of the North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study. Pediatric Transplantation 6:6, 493-499
    CrossRef

  10. 10

    Abhay Vats, Kristen Gillingham, Arthur Matas, Blanche Chavers. (2002) Improved Late Graft Survival and Half-Lives in Pediatric Kidney Transplantation: A Single Center Experience. American Journal of Transplantation 2:10, 939-945
    CrossRef

  11. 11

    Yoshikazu Toyoki, John F. Renz, Christine Mudge, Nancy L. Ascher, John P. Roberts, Philip Rosenthal. (2002) Allograft rejection in pediatric liver transplantation: Comparison between cadaveric and living related donors. Pediatric Transplantation 6:4, 301-307
    CrossRef

  12. 12

    S. A. H. Rizvi, S. A. A. Naqvi, Z. Hussain, A. Hashmi, F. Akhtar, M. N. Zafar, M. Hussain, E. Ahmed, J. I. Kazi, A. S. Hasan, R. Khalid, S. Aziz, S. Sultan. (2002) Living-related pediatric renal transplants: �A single-center experience from a developing country. Pediatric Transplantation 6:2, 101-110
    CrossRef

  13. 13

    Berthold Hocher, Aiko Pleschka, Fang Yang, Rolf Kraus, Hans-H. Neumayer, Guido Filler. (2002) G protein β3 subunit 825T genotype is not associated with differing outcome in pediatric renal transplant recipients. Pediatric Transplantation 6:2, 141-146
    CrossRef

  14. 14

    Mark M. Mitsnefes, Abiodun Omoloja, Paul T. McEnery. (2001) Short-term pediatric renal transplant survival: Blood pressure and allograft function. Pediatric Transplantation 5:3, 160-165
    CrossRef

  15. 15

    Guido Filler, Fang Yang, Anja Martin, Joachim Stolpe, Hans-Helmut Neumayer, Berthold Hocher. (2001) Renin angiotensin system gene polymorphisms in pediatric renal transplant recipients. Pediatric Transplantation 5:3, 166-173
    CrossRef

  16. 16

    Mouin Seikaly, P. L. (Martin) Ho, Lea Emmett, Amir Tejani. (2001) The 12th Annual Report of the North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study: Renal transplantation from 1987 through 1998. Pediatric Transplantation 5:3, 215-231
    CrossRef

  17. 17

    David W. Gjertson, J. Michael Cecka. (2001) Determinants of long-term survival of pediatric kidney grafts reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing kidney transplant registry. Pediatric Transplantation 5:1, 5-15
    CrossRef

  18. 18

    Ruth McDonald, Lynn Donaldson, Lea Emmett, Amir Tejani. (2000) A decade of living donor transplantation in North American children: The 1998 Annual Report of the North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study (NAPRTCS). Pediatric Transplantation 4:3, 221-234
    CrossRef

  19. 19

    Ihsan Elshihabi, Blanche Chavers, Lynn Donaldson, Lea Emmett, Amir Tejani. (2000) Continuing improvement in cadaver donor graft survival in North American children: The 1998 Annual Report of the North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study (NAPRTCS). Pediatric Transplantation 4:3, 235-246
    CrossRef

  20. 20

    Amir Tejani, E. Kenneth Sullivan. (2000) Do six-antigen-matched cadaver donor kidneys provide better graft survival to children compared with one-haploidentical living-related donor transplants? A report of the North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study. Pediatric Transplantation 4:2, 140-145
    CrossRef

  21. 21

    (2000) Chronic rejection in pediatric renal transplantation: Where are we?. Pediatric Transplantation 4:2, 83-85
    CrossRef

  22. 22

    B. Spechtenhauser, B. W. Hochleitner, H. Ellemunter, B. Simma, CH. Hörmann, A. Königsrainer, R. Margreiter. (1999) Bilateral nephrectomy, peritoneal dialysis and subsequent cadaveric renal transplantation for treatment of renal failure due to polycystic kidney disease requiring continuous ventilation. Pediatric Transplantation 3:3, 246-248
    CrossRef

  23. 23

    M. R. Benfield, R. McDonald, E. K. Sullivan, D. M. Stablein, A. Tejani. (1999) The 1997 Annual Renal Transplantation in Children Report of the North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study (NAPRTCS). Pediatric Transplantation 3:2, 152-167
    CrossRef

  24. 24

    Alberto Martinez-Castelao, Miquel Hueso, Veronica Sanz, Javier Rejas, Jeroni Alsina, Josep M. Grinyo. (1998) Treatment of hypertension after renal transplantation: Long-term efficacy of verapamil, enalapril, and doxazosin. Kidney International 54:68, 130-134
    CrossRef

  25. 25

    Rajeev K. Sathiapalan, Maria C. Velez, Mary Evelyn McWhorter, Hernan Correa, Radhakrishna Baliga, Raj P. Warrier, Kim Irwin. (1998) Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis in Children With Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia. Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology 20:5, 482-485
    CrossRef

  26. 26

    Abhinav Humar, Thomas E. Nevins, Michael Remucal, Marie E. Cook, Arthur J. Matas, John S. Najarian. (1998) Kidney Transplantation in Children Younger Than 1 Year Using Cyclosporine Immunosuppression. Annals of Surgery 228:3, 421-428
    CrossRef

  27. 27

    Masataka Honda, Seiichirou Shishido. (1998) Recent developments in the management of infants with end-stage renal disease. Clinical and Experimental Nephrology 2:1, 1-11
    CrossRef

  28. 28

    Jarmo Laine, Hannu Jalanko, Kai Ronnholm, Heikki Sairanen, Kaija Salmela, Mauri Leijala, Cbrister Holmberg. (1998) Paediatric kidney transplantation. Annals of Medicine 30:1, 45-57
    CrossRef

  29. 29

    Marc N. Turenne, Friedrich K. Port, Robert L. Strawderman, Robert B. Ettenger, Steven R. Alexander, John E. Lewy, Camille A. Jones, Lawrence Y.C. Agodoa, Philip J. Held. (1997) Growth rates in pediatric dialysis patients and renal transplant recipients. American Journal of Kidney Diseases 30:2, 193-203
    CrossRef

  30. 30

    JW BALFE. (1996) Renal replacement modalities for childhood end-stage renal failure. Nephrology 2:s1, s225-s229
    CrossRef

  31. 31

    Robert HK Mak, Youngmi K Pak. (1996) End-organ resistance to growth hormone and IGF-I in epiphyseal chondrocytes of rats with chronic renal failure. Kidney International 50:2, 400-406
    CrossRef

  32. 32

    Iekuni Ichikawa, Agnes Fogo. (1996) Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Pediatric Nephrology 10:3, 374-391
    CrossRef

  33. 33

    Maureen Andrew, Lu Ann Brooker. (1996) Hemostatic complications in renal disorders of the young. Pediatric Nephrology 10:1, 88-99
    CrossRef

  34. 34

    Kathy Jabs, E. Kenneth Sullivan, Ellis D. Avner, William E. Harmon. (1996) ALTERNATE-DAY STEROID DOSING IMPROVES GROWTH WITHOUT ADVERSELY AFFECTING GRAFT SURVIVAL OR LONG-TERM GRAFT FUNCTION. Transplantation 61:1, 31-36
    CrossRef

  35. 35

    Clifford E. Kashtan, Paul T. McEnery, Amir Tejani, Donald M. Stablein. (1995) Renal allograft survival according to primary diagnosis: a report of the North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study. Pediatric Nephrology 9:6, 679-684
    CrossRef

  36. 36

    (1995) VIII. Pediatric end-stage renal disease. American Journal of Kidney Diseases 26:4, S112-S128
    CrossRef

  37. 37

    Amir Tejani, E Kenneth Sullivan, Richard N Fine, William Harmon, Steven Alexander. (1995) Steady improvement in renal allograft survival among North American children: A five year appraisal by the North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study. Kidney International 48:2, 551-553
    CrossRef

  38. 38

    Timothy E. Bunchman. (1995) Flow cytometry: Its use in pediatric renal transplantation utilizing polyclonal induction. Cytometry 22:1, 16-21
    CrossRef

  39. 39

    Alan B. Lumsden, M. Julia MacDonald, Robert C. Allen, Thomas F. Dodson. (1994) Hemodialysis access in the pediatric patient population. The American Journal of Surgery 168:2, 197-201
    CrossRef

  40. 40

    Pierre Cochat, Fernanda Castelo, Catherine Glastre, Xavier Martin, Didier Stamm, Denise Long, Marie-Pierre Lavocat, Aoumeur Hadj-Aïssa, Denis Lyonnet, Daniel Floret. (1994) Outcome of cadaver kidney transplantation in small children. Acta Paediatrica 83:1, 78-83
    CrossRef

  41. 41

    Atul K Sharma, S Michael Mauer, Youngki Kim, Alfred F Michael. (1993) Interstitial fibrosis in obstructive nephropathy. Kidney International 44:4, 774-788
    CrossRef