Join the 200th Anniversary Celebration

Original Article

Resistance to Erythromycin in Group A Streptococci

Helena Seppälä, M.D., Antti Nissinen, M.Sc., Helinä Järvinen, M.D., M.Sc., Saara Huovinen, M.D., Taisto Henriksson, M.D., Elja Herva, M.D., Stig E. Holm, M.D., Matti Jahkola, M.D., Marja-Leena Katila, M.D., Timo Klaukka, M.D., Sirkka Kontiainen, M.D., Oili Liimatainen, M.Sc., Sinikka Oinonen, M.D., Leena Passi-Metsomaa, M.D., and Pentti Huovinen, M.D.

N Engl J Med 1992; 326:292-297January 30, 1992

Abstract
Abstract

Background.

The use of erythromycin in Finland nearly tripled from 1979 to 1989. In 1988, we observed an unusually high frequency of resistance to erythromycin in group A streptococci in one geographic region. Because routine testing does not detect the sensitivity of these organisms to antibiotics, we initiated a national study to evaluate the extent of this resistance.

Methods.

We studied 272 isolates of group A streptococci obtained from blood cultures from 1988 through 1990. In 1990 we collected from six regional laboratories 3087 consecutive isolates from throat swabs and 1349 isolates from pus samples. Resistance was indicated by growth on blood agar containing 2 μg of erythromycin per milliliter after incubation in 5 percent carbon dioxide. We also evaluated the clinical importance of erythromycin resistance in a retrospective study of consecutive patients with pharyngitis.

Results.

The frequency of resistance to erythromycin in group A streptococci from blood cultures increased from 4 percent in 1988 to 24 percent in 1990. From January to December 1990, the frequency of resistance in isolates from throat swabs increased from 7 percent to 20 percent, and resistance in isolates from pus increased from 11 percent to 31 percent. In four communities within 50 km of each other, the frequency of erythromycin resistance ranged from 2 to 5 percent to 26 to 44 percent. Several distinct DNA restriction profiles and serotypes were found among resistant isolates from the same area, suggesting a multiclonal origin. The treatment of pharyngitis with erythromycin failed in 9 of 19 patients infected with erythromycin-resistant group A streptococci, as compared with 1 of 26 patients with erythromycin-susceptible isolates (47 percent vs. 4 percent, P = 0.008).

Conclusions.

In Finland since 1988 there has been a rapid and substantial increase in resistance to erythromycin in group A streptococci. The extent of this resistance is particularly serious since there are only a few alternative antibiotics available for peroral treatment of group A streptococcal infections. (N Engl J Med 1992;326: 292–7.)

Media in This Article

Figure 1Sales of Erythromycin in Finland from 1978 to 1989, Expressed as the Defined Daily Dose per 1000 Inhabitants per Day (DDD/1000/day).
Figure 2Frequency of Resistance to Erythromycin in 3087 Throat-Swab Isolates of Group A Streptococci (Panel A) and 1349 Isolates from Pus Samples (Panel B) in Finland in 1990.
Article

IN the past five years, the importance of group A streptococcal infections has increased in North America and Europe as well as in other parts of the world.1 In Northern Europe, the number of life-threatening infections caused by group A streptococci has increased and caused considerable concern.2 , 3 All group A streptococci are susceptible to penicillin, and the majority are also susceptible to erythromycin and clindamycin. For patients who are allergic to penicillin, erythromycin has been the drug of choice for treating these infections.

Although erythromycin often has gastrointestinal side effects,4 , 5 the drug has been an effective and very safe antimicrobial agent. This experience, combined with the increasing importance of Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Chlamydia pneumoniae as respiratory-tract pathogens,6 7 8 9 has contributed to the increasing use of erythromycin. The sale of erythromycin in Finland increased from 1.1 defined daily doses per 1000 inhabitants per day in 1979 to 3.2 in 1988 (the defined daily dose is 1 g of erythromycin); in 1989 the corresponding figure was 3.0 defined daily doses (Fig. 1Figure 1Sales of Erythromycin in Finland from 1978 to 1989, Expressed as the Defined Daily Dose per 1000 Inhabitants per Day (DDD/1000/day).).10 11 12 In 1988, erythromycin accounted for 15 percent of the total consumption of antibiotics, and its use was exceeded only by that of tetracyclines (28 percent) and penicillin V (phenoxymethylpenicillin) (21 percent).

In 1988 we observed an unexpectedly high frequency of erythromycin-resistant group A streptococcal isolates from throat swabs obtained in the area of Turku, on the southwestern coast of Finland.13 Because clinical-microbiology laboratories do not usually assay the susceptibility of group A streptococci to antibiotics, we postulated that a similar increase might be more widespread but unnoticed. We therefore decided to conduct a nationwide study of erythromycin resistance in group A streptococcal isolates.

Methods

The group A streptococcal isolates from throat-swab and pus samples were collected from the regional microbiologic laboratories of six areas of Finland. After the first signs of increased erythromycin resistance,13 we collected about 50 consecutive throat-swab isolates containing group A streptococci from the six areas in November and December of 1988 and 1989. During 1990, all isolates of group A streptococci from routine throat-swab and pus samples were collected, for a total of 4436 isolates. Beta-hemolytic colonies were identified with commercial latex-agglutination techniques (Streptex, Wellcome, Dartford, United Kingdom, and Phadebact, Pharmacia, Solna, Sweden). Group A streptococcal isolates were then cultured on Müller-Hinton agar (Oxoid, Basingstoke, United Kingdom) containing 5 percent sheep's blood and 2 μg of erythromycin per milliliter and were incubated in an atmosphere containing 5 percent carbon dioxide. In our experience, group A streptococcal isolates can be better classified as resistant or susceptible in such an atmosphere, because the difference between susceptible and resistant populations of organisms at their minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) is wider and more distinct in carbon dioxide than in ambient air (data not shown). Erythromycin resistance was indicated by growth on a blood-agar plate with an erythromycin concentration of 2 μg per milliliter or more. When cultures are incubated in 5 percent carbon dioxide, this cutoff point correlates well with an MIC of more than 0.5 μg per milliliter on incubation in ambient air; this concentration is recommended as the cutoff point between susceptible and moderately susceptible bacteria by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards.14

The MIC values were determined with plates whose concentration of erythromycin or clindamycin ranged from 0.12 to 16 μg per milliliter. Incubation was carried out in an atmosphere containing 5 percent carbon dioxide. The bacterial inoculum was prepared according to the guidelines of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards14 and placed on plates by means of a multipoint inoculator. Staphylococcus aureus American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) 29213, Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212, Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, and Streptococcus pyogenes ATCC 10389 were used as controls for testing susceptibility.

Group A streptococci from blood cultures were collected nationwide by the Department of Bacteriology of the National Public Health Institute from 1988 through 1990. Of the 293 isolates, 6 to 9 per year were not received from the regional laboratories; thus, 272 isolates were available for the determination of MIC plate-dilution susceptibility to erythromycin and clindamycin. The erythromycin MICs of isolates from throat swabs and pus samples growing on the blood-agar plates containing erythromycin (2 μg per milliliter) were also determined; 94 percent of the 578 isolates tested were resistant to erythromycin. The clindamycin MICs of 500 pharyngeal group A streptococcal isolates from the Turku area were also determined; the cutoff point used for determining clindamycin resistance was also 2 μg per milliliter or more.

While screening for erythromycin resistance, we followed the local spread of erythromycin-resistant group A streptococci in the Turku area, using a commercial disk-diffusion method (Rosco, Taastrup, Denmark). The plates were incubated in an atmosphere containing 5 percent carbon dioxide. The isolates were defined as resistant or susceptible (the term "susceptible" included isolates that were moderately susceptible) according to the guidelines of the manufacturer. The relevance of the disk test was also determined. Of 228 pharyngeal isolates shown to be susceptible by the disk test, 96 percent were also shown to be susceptible by the MIC plate-dilution test. Similarly, 96 percent of the 75 resistant isolates were resistant according to the MIC plate-dilution test.

The clinical effects of erythromycin and penicillin on the outcome of pharyngitis caused by erythromycin-resistant and erythromycin-susceptible group A streptococci were surveyed at the Pöytyä and Parainen health centers (penicillin was used as a control factor). In Finland, medical care is free of charge and the majority of the population is treated at local health centers. We collected the medical records of all patients from 1988 through 1990 with erythromycin-resistant or erythromycin-susceptiblc group A streptococcal isolates from throat-swab samples (as determined by the disk test). In this study, treatment was considered to have failed clinically or bacteriologically (or both clinically and bacteriologically) if symptoms of infection persisted or the throat culture was still positive for group A streptococci two days after treatment began or three days after it was completed.

To obtain an impression of how widely erythromycin-resistant group A streptococci had spread in Pöytyä, we collected throat-swab samples from children at the local primary school and daycare center who had no symptoms of infection. The samples were cultured immediately on plates with 5 percent sheep's-blood agar, and the MICs of beta-hemolytic streptococcal isolates were determined with the MIC plate-dilution method described above.

The clonal similarity of the group A streptococci was determined by using DNA restriction endonucleases for total digestion of 95 throat-swab or pus isolates randomly chosen from the six laboratories. The DNA was prepared and digested with HindIII (Boehringer–Mannheim, Oriola, Espoo, Finland) as described by Skjold et al.15 and Cleary et al.16 The serotypes of these 95 isolates were also determined. The T type of each isolate was identified by slide agglutination of trypsin-digested suspensions of washed bacterial cells in the presence of type-specific antiserums (Institute of Sera and Vaccines, Sevac, Prague, Czechoslovakia). The types were further identified with the serum opacity reaction of Maxted and Widdowson.17

Figures for the sales of erythromycin in each area were obtained from data based on the Finnish Statistics on Medicines 18 or, for Pöytyä, directly from the local pharmacy.

Fisher's exact test and the chi-square test were used for statistical analysis. A P value below 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

Results

Resistance of Group A Streptococci to Erythromycin

Blood Cultures

Of the 272 blood-culture isolates available for susceptibility testing, 56 were collected in 1988, 116 in 1989, and 100 in 1990. The frequency of resistance to erythromycin was 4 percent in 1988, 7 percent in 1989, and 24 percent in 1990; the increase in resistance was significant (7 percent vs. 24 percent, P = 0.004). Only two of the blood-culture isolates obtained in 1990 were resistant to clindamycin.

Throat-Swab and Pus Samples

We collected 296 group A streptococcal isolates from throat-swab samples from the six laboratories in November and December 1988 and 310 during the same months in 1989. In 1988 5.4 percent of the isolates were resistant to erythromycin according to the MIC-plate dilution test, and in 1989 4.2 percent. There was no marked variation according to geographic area or year in the frequency of resistance in these samples.

In 1990, 590 of 4436 isolates of group A streptococci from throat-swab or pus samples (13 percent) were found to be resistant to erythromycin; 11 percent of the 3087 isolates from throat swabs were resistant, and 19 percent of the 1349 isolates from pus — a significant difference (P<0.0001) (Table 1Table 1Erythromycin Resistance of Group A Streptococci Isolated from Throat-Swab and Pus Samples in Six Areas in Finland in 1990.). The monthly frequency of erythromycin resistance among the 3087 pharyngeal isolates ranged from 6.2 to 8.2 percent in the period January to June, to 10 to 20 percent in the period July to December (Fig. 2AFigure 2Frequency of Resistance to Erythromycin in 3087 Throat-Swab Isolates of Group A Streptococci (Panel A) and 1349 Isolates from Pus Samples (Panel B) in Finland in 1990.). Among the 1349 isolates from pus, the frequency of resistance ranged from 9.0 to 11 percent in the period January to March to 12 to 32 percent in the period April to December (Fig. 2B). Resistance to clindamycin was not detected in the 500 pharyngeal isolates studied, all of which were collected from the Turku area.

The highest incidence of resistance was found in the Kuopio area, where 29 percent of the throat-swab isolates and 54 percent of the isolates from pus samples were erythromycin-resistant (Table 1); among the 50 isolates studied in 1988 and the 50 studied in 1989, 0 percent and 8 percent, respectively, were erythromycin-resistant. In the southern part of Finland (the areas of Helsinki, Turku, and Tampere), the frequency of resistance in 1990 was intermediate and ranged from 7.7 to 16 percent in isolates from throat-swab samples and from 11 to 12 percent in pus samples. In western and northern Finland (Seinäjoki and Oulu areas), resistance was notably less frequent — i.e., 2.3 to 2.5 percent in throat-swab samples and 2.3 to 8.5 percent in pus samples.

A marked increase in the frequency of erythromycin-resistant group A streptococci was observed in two areas during 1990. In the Turku and Tampere districts, the frequency of resistant throat-swab isolates increased from 7 percent in each district in January 1990 to 19 percent and 24 percent, respectively, in December. The corresponding figures for isolates from pus samples were 19 percent and 12 percent in January and 33 percent and 42 percent in December.

In 1990 we analyzed the local distribution of erythromycin-resistant pharyngeal group A streptococci in the Turku area. Of 1259 isolates, 126 were collected from the city of Turku (January 1990 only), 259 from Kaarina, 154 from Pöytyä, 262 from Parainen, and 458 from other communities. In the cities of Kaarina and Turku, the frequency of resistant isolates was 2 to 5 percent. However, in Pöytyä, 30 km north of Turku, the frequency was no lower than 44 percent, and in Parainen, 15 km south of Turku, the corresponding figure was 26 percent. In the remaining suburban areas, 9 percent of isolates were resistant.

The clonality of erythromycin-resistant group A streptococci was studied by analysis of DNA restriction profiles. Among the 95 isolates, 14 different clones were identified. In Helsinki, 4 different DNA restriction profiles were detected among the 15 isolates. In Turku, 3 profiles were found among 17 isolates; in Tampere, 3 profiles among 20 isolates; in Kuopio, 4 profiles among 22 isolates; in Seinäjoki, 1 profile among 4 isolates; and in Oulu, 3 profiles among 17 isolates. Figure 3Figure 3DNA Restriction-Endonuclease (HindIII) Profiles of Selected Group A Streptococcal Isolates. shows the variability of the profiles among 14 erythromycin-resistant isolates selected from among the isolates in all areas studied. Although there were some identical restriction profiles among the isolates from different areas, none of the profiles predominated. The serotypes of 35 of the 95 isolates (37 percent) could not be determined. Eight serotypes were identified among the remaining 60 isolates — i.e., T4M4 (27 isolates), T11M12 (9), T28 (9), T22 (6), T12M12 (5), T1M1 (2), T11 (1), and T4 (1).

To assess how widespread erythromycin-resistant group A streptococci were among healthy children in Pöytyä, we studied 239 children from a primary school and day-care center. Seven children had pharyngeal cultures that were positive for group A streptococci, and six of the isolates were erythromycin-resistant. We also found 23 isolates of group C streptococci, 9 isolates of group G streptococci, 12 isolates of group F streptococci, and 9 isolates of beta-hemolytic streptococci, none of which could be typed. Only a group G streptococcal isolate was resistant to erythromycin, with an MIC of 2 μg per milliliter.

Treatment of Pharyngitis with Erythromycin

The medical records of 196 patients with throat-swab samples containing erythromycin-resistant group A streptococci were retrieved and studied together with the records of 333 patients with erythromycin-susceptible group A streptococci (Table 2Table 2Frequency of Failure of Treatment of Group A Streptococcal Pharyngitis.). Erythromycin had been used to treat pharyngitis in 19 of the 196 patients with erythromycin-resistant isolates and in 26 of the 333 patients with erythromycin-susceptible isolates (Table 2). The rate of treatment failure was 47 percent in the former group (9 of 19 patients) and 4 percent in the latter (1 of 26 patients) (P = 0.0008). As a control measure, the results of penicillin treatment were also studied. Fifty-seven of 80 consecutive patients with erythromycin-resistant isolates had been treated with penicillin, with a failure rate of 9 percent, and 171 of 179 consecutive patients with erythromycin-susceptible isolates had received penicillin, with a failure rate of 3 percent (P = 0.126) (Table 2).

Use of Erythromycin in Finland

In 1989, erythromycin was sold in Finland in an amount equal to 3.0 defined daily doses per 1000 inhabitants per day. The amount sold in various regions was as follows: 3.7 defined daily doses per 1000 inhabitants per day in the Helsinki area, 3.1 in the Turku area, 2.6 in the Tampere area, 2.3 in the Seinäjoki area, 3.1 in the Kuopio area, and 2.6 in the Oulu area. Regional data for the previous years were not available. In Pöytyä the consumption of erythromycin was 2.2 defined daily doses per 1000 inhabitants per day in 1989, and in the city of Turku the corresponding figure was 4.1.

Discussion

Our study shows that erythromycin-resistant strains of group A streptococci have emerged rapidly in Finland. This was evident in a study of isolates from blood cultures, as well as from pharyngeal and pus samples. During 1990 the frequency of resistant isolates increased in the Kuopio, Turku, and Tampere areas; however, in Helsinki it remained at the previous level, and in the Seinäjoki and Oulu districts resistant isolates were seen only rarely. In addition to the emergence of resistance, we found that erythromycin treatment frequently failed to cure throat infections caused by erythromycin-resistant isolates (Table 2).

As well as an overall increase in the levels of resistance to erythromycin, there was great local variation in resistance in the Turku area. In four communities within 50 km of each other, the rate of resistance to erythromycin ranged from 2 percent to 44 percent. This variation cannot be explained by differences in the use of erythromycin on the community level. The level of resistance in Turku was 5 percent, but in Pöytyä, only 30 km north, it was 44 percent, even though the use of erythromycin in Turku was almost twice that in Pöytyä. We made the same finding in the six areas we studied. Resistance was clearly highest in the Kuopio area, but the use of erythromycin there was similar to that in the Helsinki and Turku areas, where resistance was less frequent. Although the possibility of an increase in erythromycin use over time in a particular area could not be evaluated, it is hard to find any explanation for the overall increase in resistance other than the general increase in the use of this drug (Fig. 1).

Several reports of erythromycin resistance among group A streptococci have been published.19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 According to these reports, the resistance of group A streptococci ranged from 1 percent to 18 percent. However, most of these studies were based on small numbers of isolates and lacked follow-up data. An increasing trend toward erythromycin resistance resembling that in the present study was reported more than a decade ago from Japan,30 , 31 where the frequency of erythromycin-resistant group A streptococci first increased to 70 to 80 percent and then decreased after the use of erythromycin was reduced.31

In this study, erythromycin resistance was found to be significantly higher among isolates from pus samples than among those from pharyngeal samples (Table 1). The most common focus of infection in Finnish patients with septicemia due to group A streptococci is the skin (unpublished data). This may explain the simultaneous increase in erythromycin resistance in group A streptococcal isolates from blood cultures and pus samples. In addition, the emergence of erythromycin resistance in group A streptococci took place at the same time as an increase in the frequency of group A streptococcal septicemia.2

The high frequency of resistance to erythromycin in group A streptococci is of major clinical concern, because only a few peroral antibiotics are useful for treating infections caused by these organisms. If treatment with erythromycin is excluded, the only drugs available for patients who cannot take penicillin are the peroral cephalosporins and clindamycin. Although resistance to erythromycin and resistance to clindamycin are often linked (the constitutive type of resistance32), we did not detect any clindamycin-resistant group A streptococci among the erythromycin-resistant throat-swab isolates. However, because of the inducible type of resistance,32 clindamycin may not be clinically effective against these isolates despite their susceptibility in vitro. Trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole (cotrimoxazole) cannot be used because of the intrinsic resistance of group A streptococci to this drug,33 and the efficacy of the fluoroquinolones against group A streptococcal infections has not yet been established. Because of possible cross-resistance, the effect of different new macrolide antibiotics against erythromycin-resistant group A streptococci should also be evaluated.

Our restriction-profile analysis identified 14 clones among the 95 selected isolates of group A streptococci, with no single clone predominating. However, among these isolates, only eight serotypes were identified, and the serotypes of 37 percent could not be determined. Restriction-endonuclease profiles have been shown to correlate well with the M serotypes of different group A streptococci.16 We did not look for such a correlation in this study, but we found the determination of these profiles useful in showing the clonal diversity of group A streptococci. In Japan, an outbreak of infection with erythromycin-resistant group A streptococci was caused mainly by the T12 serotype.30 Our experience was more like that of Canadian investigators, who demonstrated that erythromycin-resistant isolates represented several different serotypes.19 The resistance of streptococci to erythromycin is typically plasmid-mediated,34 which could explain the rapid spread of resistance to different clones of group A streptococci (Fig. 3). More studies are in progress to determine the mechanisms of erythromycin resistance in isolates found in our country.

In Finland, the use of erythromycin in 1988 and 1989 was almost three times that in 1978 (Fig. 1). When the rates of use in Nordic countries in 1989 were compared, the rate in Finland was 50 percent higher than that in Denmark and 100 percent higher than that in Sweden and Norway.12 Furthermore, a trend toward increasing use of the drug was observed only in Finland. In 1983, erythromycin was consumed at a rate of 4.1 defined daily doses per 1000 inhabitants per day in the United States, 2.8 doses in Australia, 2.4 doses in Canada, and 2.3 doses in France.35 These figures are similar to or higher than those for Finland.

In conclusion, the increased frequency of erythromycin resistance in group A streptococci is a serious problem. We do not see any possible way to control this clinical problem except to reduce the use of erythromycin and other macrolides. We also believe that frequent determination of the susceptibility of group A streptococci to erythromycin by clinical-microbiology laboratories worldwide would be valuable to show how extensively erythromycin-resistant group A streptococci have spread and to follow changes in patterns of resistance.

Supported by the Sigrid Juselius Foundation (funds to Drs. Seppälä, S. Huovinen, and P. Huovinen), Eli Lilly S.A. (funds to Mr. Nissinen), and Lääkefarmos Orion Co. (funds to Dr. Seppälä).

We are indebted to Professor P. Helena Mäkelä for valuable advice; to Ritva Scotford, Marja-Liisa Lindman, Tarja Boman, and Ann-Sofie Hakulinen for expert technical assistance; to Mildrid Ekelund and Pirjo Saarinen for the figures on erythromycin use in the Pöytyä community; and to Dr. Robert Paul for assistance in editing.

Source Information

From the Antimicrobial Research Unit, National Institute of Public Health, Turku, Finland (H.S., H.J., S.H., P.H.); the Oulu Regional Institute, National Institute of Public Health, Oulu, Finland (E.H.); the Department of Bacteriology, National Institute of Public Health, Helsinki (A.N., M.J.); the Department of Clinical Microbiology, University of Umeå, Umeå, Sweden (S.E.H.); the health centers of Parainen (T.H.) and Pöytyä (L.P.-M.), Finland; the departments of Clinical Microbiology of Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland (M.-L.K.), Aurora Hospital, Helsinki (S.K.), Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland (O.L.), and Seinäjoki Central Hospital, Seinäjoki, Finland (S.O.); and the Research Institute for Social Security of the Social Insurance Institution, Helsinki (T.K.). Address reprint requests to Dr. Seppälä at the Antimicrobial Research Unit, National Institute of Public Health, P.O. Box 57, 20521 Turku, Finland.

References

References

  1. 1

    Kaplan EL. The resurgence of group A streptococcal infections and their sequelae . Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1991;10:55–7.
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  2. 2

    Mäkelä PH, Jahkola M. Group A streptococci must be taken seriously . Finn Med J 1989;44:419–22.

  3. 3

    Martin RR, Høiby EA. Streptococcal serogroup A epidemic in Norway 1987—1988 . Scand J Infect Dis 1990;22:421–9.
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  4. 4

    Malmborg A-S. The renaissance of erythromycin . J Antimicrob Chemother 1986:18:293–6.
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  5. 5

    Fernandes PB. The macrolide revival: thirty-five years after erythromycin . Antimicrob Newslett 1987;4:25–34.
    CrossRef

  6. 6

    Komaroff AL, Aronson MD, Pass TM, Ervin CT, Branch WT Jr, Schachter J. Serologic evidence of chlamydial and mycoplasmal pharyngitis in adults . Science 1983;222:927–9.
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  7. 7

    Huovinen P, Lahtonen R, Ziegler T, et al. Pharyngitis in adults: the presence and co-existence of viruses and bacterial organisms . Ann Intern Med 1989;110:612–6.
    Web of Science | Medline

  8. 8

    Grayston JT, Campbell LA, Kuo C-C, et al. A new respiratory tract pathogen: Chlamydia pneumoniae strain TWAR . J Infect Dis 1990;161:618–25.
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  9. 9

    Mycoplasma pneumoniae . Lancet 1991;337:651–2.
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  10. 10

    Nordic statistics on medicines 1978—1980. Part 1. Uppsala, Sweden: Nordic Council on Medicines, 1982. (NLN publication 8.)

  11. 11

    Nordic statistics on medicines 1981—1983. Part 1. Uppsala, Sweden: Nordic Council on Medicines, 1986. (NLN publication 14.)

  12. 12

    Nordic statistics on medicines 1987—1989. Uppsala, Sweden: Nordic Council on Medicines, 1990. (NLN publication 30.)

  13. 13

    Järvinen H, Nissinen A, Huovinen P. Erythromycin resistance in group A streptococci . Lancet 1989;1:1022–3.
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  14. 14

    National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Vol. 10. No. 8. Villanova, Pa.: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, 1990:M7–A2.

  15. 15

    Skjold AS, Quie PG, Fries LA, Barnham M. Cleary pp. DNA fingerprinting of Streptococcus zooepidemicus (Lancefield group C) as an aid to epidemiological study . J Infect Dis 1987;155:1145–50.
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  16. 16

    Cleary pp. Kaplan EL, Livdahl C, Skjold S. DNA fingerprints of Streptococcus pyogenes are M type specific . J Infect Dis 1988;158:1317–23.
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  17. 17

    Maxted WR, Widdowson JP. The protein antigens of group A streptococci. In: Wannamaker LW, Matsen JM, eds. Streptococci and streptococcal diseases. New York: Academic Press, 1972:256–61.

  18. 18

    Finnish statistics on medicines. Helsinki, Finland: Finnish Committee on Drug Information and Statistics, 1990.

  19. 19

    Dixon JMS, Lipinski AE. Infections with beta-hemolytic Streptococcus resistant to lincomycin and erythromycin and observations on zonal-pattern resistance to lincomycin . J Infect Dis 1974;130:351–6.
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  20. 20

    Istre GR, Welch DF, Marks MI, Moyer N. Susceptibility of group A beta-hemolytic Streptococcus isolates to penicillin and erythromycin . Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1981;20:244–6.
    Web of Science | Medline

  21. 21

    Zackrisson G, Lind L, Roos K, Larsson P. Erythromycin-resistant beta-hemolytic streptococci group A in Göteborg, Sweden . Scand J Infect Dis 1988;20:419–20.
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  22. 22

    Borzani M, Varotto F, Garlaschi L, Conio F, DellOlio M, Careddu P. Clinical and microbiological evaluation of miocamycin activity against group A beta-hemolytic streptococci in pediatric patients . J Chemother 1989;1:35–8.
    Web of Science | Medline

  23. 23

    Perez-Trallero E, Garcia-Arenzana JM, Urbieta-Ergana M. Erythromycin resistance in streptococci . Lancet 1989;2:444–5.
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  24. 24

    Stingemore N, Francis GRJ, Toohey M, McGechie DB. The emergence of erythromycin resistance in Streptococcus pyogenes in Fremantle, Western Australia . Med J Aust 1989;150:626–31.
    Web of Science | Medline

  25. 25

    Scott RJD, Naidoo J, Lightfoot NF, George RC A community outbreak of group A beta-haemolytic streptococci with transferable resistance to erythromycin . Epidemiol Infect 1989;102:85–91.
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  26. 26

    Spencer RC, Wheat PF, Magee JT, Brown EH. Erythromycin resistance in streptococci . Lancet 1989;1:168.
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  27. 27

    Wittler RR, Yamada SM, Bass JW, Hamill R, Wiebe RA, Ascher DP. Penicillin tolerance and erythromycin resistance of group A beta-hemolytic streptococci in Hawaii and the Philippines . Am J Dis Child 1990;144:587–9.
    Web of Science | Medline

  28. 28

    Phillips G, Parratt D, Orange GV, Harper I, McEwan H, Young N. Erythromycin-resistant Streptococcus pyogenes . J Antimicrob Chemother 1990;25: 723–4.
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  29. 29

    Holmström L, Nyman B, Rosengren M, Wallander S, Ripa T. Outbreaks of infections with erythromycin-resistant group A streptococci in child day care centres . Scand J Infect Dis 1990;22:179–85.
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  30. 30

    Miyamoto Y, Takizawa K, Matsushima Y, Asai Y, Nakatsuka S. Stepwise acquisition of multiple drug resistance by beta-hemolytic streptococci and difference in resistance pattern by type . Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1978;13:399–404.
    Web of Science | Medline

  31. 31

    Maruyama S, Yoshioka H, Fujita K, Takimoto M, Satake Y. Sensitivity of group A streptococci to antibiotics . Am J Dis Child 1979;133:1143–5.
    Web of Science | Medline

  32. 32

    Weisblum B. Inducible resistance to macrolides, lincosamides and streptogramin type B antibiotics: the resistance phenotype, its biological diversity, and structural elements that regulate expression — a review . J Antimicrob Chemother 1985;l6:Suppl A:63–90.

  33. 33

    Gunn BA, Ohashi DK, Gaydos CA. Holt ES. Selective and enhanced recovery of group A and B streptococci from throat cultures with sheep blood agar containing sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim . J Clin Microbiol 1977;5: 650–5.
    Web of Science | Medline

  34. 34

    Horaud T, Le Bouguenec C, Pepper K. Molecular genetics of resistance to macrolides, lincosamides and streptogramin B (MLS) in streptococci . J Antimicrob Chemother 1985;16:Suppl A:111–35.
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  35. 35

    Col NF, O'Connor RW. Estimating worldwide current antibiotic usage: report of Task Force 1 . Rev Infect Dis 1987;9:Suppl 3:S232–S243.
    CrossRef | Medline

Citing Articles (96)

Citing Articles

  1. 1

    Alberto Villaseñor-Sierra, Eva Katahira, Abril N. Jaramillo-Valdivia, María de los Angeles Barajas-García, Amy Bryant, Rayo Morfín-Otero, Francisco Márquez-Díaz, Juan Carlos Tinoco, José Sánchez-Corona, Dennis L. Stevens. (2012) Phenotypes and genotypes of erythromycin-resistant Streptococcus pyogenes strains isolated from invasive and non-invasive infections from Mexico and the USA during 1999–2010. International Journal of Infectious Diseases
    CrossRef

  2. 2

    Vladimir Krcmery. (2011) Are subinhibitory concentrations of antibiotics the only culprit of antibiotic resistance?. Future Microbiology 6:12, 1391-1394
    CrossRef

  3. 3

    Manel Hraoui, Ilhem Boutiba-Ben Boubaker, Alexandra Doloy, SaÏda Ben Redjeb, Anne Bouvet. (2011) Molecular Mechanisms of Tetracycline and Macrolide Resistance and emm Characterization of Streptococcus pyogenes Isolates in Tunisia. Microbial Drug Resistance 17:3, 377-382
    CrossRef

  4. 4

    Diana Lennon, Saleh A. Al Tamimi. (2011) Commentary on ‘Short versus standard duration antibiotic therapy for acute streptococcal pharyngitis in children’. Evidence-Based Child Health: A Cochrane Review Journal 6:2, 803-805
    CrossRef

  5. 5

    Ellie JC Goldstein. (2011) Beyond the target pathogen: ecological effects of the hospital formulary. Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases 24:Suppl 1, S21-S31
    CrossRef

  6. 6

    Himanshu Desai, Sandra Richter, Gary Doern, Kris Heilmann, Cassie Dohrn, Antoinette Johnson, Aimee Brauer, Timothy Murphy, Sanjay Sethi. (2010) Antibiotic Resistance in Sputum Isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease is Related to Antibiotic Exposure. COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 7:5, 337-344
    CrossRef

  7. 7

    DACE ZAVADSKA, DACE BĒRZIŅA, LĪGA DRUKAĻSKA, ŅINA PUGAČOVA, EDVĪNS MIKLAŠEVIČS, DACE GARDOVSKA. (2010) Macrolide resistance in group A beta haemolytic Streptococcus isolated from outpatient children in Latvia. APMIS 118:5, 366-370
    CrossRef

  8. 8

    Hesheng Chang, Xuzhuang Shen, Zhou Fu, Lan Liu, Ying Shen, Xiaorong Liu, Sangjie Yu, Kaihu Yao, Chengsong Zhao, Yonghong Yang. (2010) Antibiotic resistance and molecular analysis of Streptococcus pyogenes isolated from healthy schoolchildren in China. Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases 42:2, 84-89
    CrossRef

  9. 9

    Judith M. Martin. (2010) Pharyngitis and Streptococcal Throat Infections. Pediatric Annals 39:1, 22-27
    CrossRef

  10. 10

    GIAN-ITALO BISCHI, UGO MERLONE. (2009) Global Dynamics in Binary Choice Models with Social Influence. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology 33:4, 277-302
    CrossRef

  11. 11

    M.L. Avramov Ivić, S.D. Petrović, D.Ž. Mijin, F. Vanmoos, D.Ž. Orlović, D.Ž. Marjanović, V.V. Radović. (2008) The electrochemical behavior of erythromycin A on a gold electrode. Electrochimica Acta 54:2, 649-654
    CrossRef

  12. 12

    Pentti Huovinen, Helena Seppälä, Janne Kataja, Timo Klaukka. 2007. The Relationship Between Erythromycin Consumption and Resistance in Finland. , 36-46.
    CrossRef

  13. 13

    Preeti Jaggi, Bernard Beall, Jason Rippe, Robert R. Tanz, Stanford T. Shulman. (2007) Macrolide Resistance and emm Type Distribution of Invasive Pediatric Group A Streptococcal Isolates. The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 26:3, 253-255
    CrossRef

  14. 14

    Robin LaCroix, Anna Kathryn Rye. (2007) Group A Streptococcus: Another Resistant Pathogen. Southern Medical Journal 100:3, 260-261
    CrossRef

  15. 15

    Milagrosa Montes, Beatriz Orden, Esther Tamayo, Juan-Ignacio Alos, Emilio Pérez-Trallero. (2006) Characterisation of the main clones of Streptococcus pyogenes carrying the ermA (subclass TR) gene in Spain. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 28:5, 408-412
    CrossRef

  16. 16

    SR Arnold, SE Straus. (2006) Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices in ambulatory care. Evidence-Based Child Health: A Cochrane Review Journal 1:2, 623-690
    CrossRef

  17. 17

    Sandra R Arnold, Sharon E Straus, Sandra R Arnold. 2005. Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices in ambulatory care. .
    CrossRef

  18. 18

    Karel Urbánek, Milan Kolář, Luboslava Čekanová. (2005) Utilisation of macrolides and the development of Streptococcus pyogenes resistance to erythromycin. Pharmacy World & Science 27:2, 104-107
    CrossRef

  19. 19

    Tom. J. Cleophas. (2005) Author's Reply. Statistics in Medicine 24:2, 321-323
    CrossRef

  20. 20

    R. R. Tanz, S. T. Shulman, V. D. Shortridge, W. Kabat, K. Kabat, E. Cederlund, J. Rippe, J. Beyer, S. Doktor, B. W. Beall, . (2004) Community-Based Surveillance in the United States of Macrolide-Resistant Pediatric Pharyngeal Group A Streptococci during 3 Respiratory Disease Seasons. Clinical Infectious Diseases 39:12, 1794-1801
    CrossRef

  21. 21

    Sunjoo Kim, Nam Yong Lee. (2004) Antibiotic Resistance and Genotypic Characteristics of Group A Streptococci Associated with Acute Pharyngitis in Korea. Microbial Drug Resistance 10:4, 300-305
    CrossRef

  22. 22

    George A. Syrogiannopoulos, Bülent Bozdogan, Ioanna N. Grivea, Lois M. Ednie, Dimitra I. Kritikou, George D. Katopodis, Nicholas G. Beratis, Peter C. Appelbaum. (2004) Two Dosages of Clarithromycin for Five Days, Amoxicillin/Clavulanate for Five Days or Penicillin V for Ten Days in Acute Group A Streptococcal Tonsillopharyngitis. The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 23:9, 857-865
    CrossRef

  23. 23

    S. D. Putnam, M. S. Riddle, T. F. Wierzba, B. T. Pittner, R. A. Elyazeed, A. El-Gendy, M. R. Rao, J. D. Clemens, R. W. Frenck. (2004) Antimicrobial susceptibility trends among Escherichia coli and Shigella spp. isolated from rural Egyptian paediatric populations with diarrhoea between 1995 and 2000. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 10:9, 804-810
    CrossRef

  24. 24

    Rainer Gattringer, Robert Sauermann, Heimo Lagler, Karin Stich, Astrid Buxbaum, Wolfgang Graninger, Apostolos Georgopoulos. (2004) Antimicrobial susceptibility and macrolide resistance genes in Streptococcus pyogenes collected in Austria and Hungary. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 24:3, 290-293
    CrossRef

  25. 25

    Alexander K. C. Leung, James D. Kellner. (2004) Group A β-hemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis in children. Advances in Therapy 21:5, 277-287
    CrossRef

  26. 26

    C.E. Cocuzza, A. Lanzafame, F. Sisto, F. Broccolo, R. Mattina. (2004) Prevalence of the Internalization-Associated Gene prtF1 in a Bacterial Population of Streptococcus pyogenes Isolated from Children with Acute Pharyngotonsillitis before and after Antibiotic Therapy. Microbial Drug Resistance 10:3, 264-268
    CrossRef

  27. 27

    Waheeb Sakran, Raul Raz, Bibiana Chazan, Ariel Koren, Raul Colodner. (2004) Susceptibility of Streptococcus pyogenes to two macrolides in northern Israel. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 23:5, 517-519
    CrossRef

  28. 28

    Ton J. Cleophas. (2004) Clinical trials and p-values, beware of the extremes. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine 42:3, 300-304
    CrossRef

  29. 29

    ROBERT COHEN. (2004) Defining the optimum treatment regimen for azithromycin in acute tonsillopharyngitis. The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 23:Supplement, S129-S134
    CrossRef

  30. 30

    J.A. Sutcliffe. (2003) Antibacterial Agents: Solutions for the Evolving Problems of Resistance. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters 13:23, 4159-4161
    CrossRef

  31. 31

    Milan Čižman. (2003) The use and resistance to antibiotics in the community. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 21:4, 297-307
    CrossRef

  32. 32

    R.E.C. d'Oliveira, R.R. Barros, C.R.V. Mendonça, L.M. Teixeira, A.C.D. Castro. (2003) Antimicrobial Susceptibility and Survey of Macrolide Resistance Mechanisms among Streptococcus pyogenes Isolated in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Microbial Drug Resistance 9:1, 87-91
    CrossRef

  33. 33

    C. González-Rey, A.-M. Belin, H. Jörbeck, M. Norman, K. Krovacek, B. Henriques, G. Källenius, S.B. Svenson. (2003) RAPD-PCR and PFGE as tools in the investigation of an outbreak of beta-haemolytic Streptococcus group A in a Swedish hospital. Comparative Immunology, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 26:1, 25-35
    CrossRef

  34. 34

    Alexandra F. Freeman, Stanford T. Shulman. (2002) Macrolide resistance in group A Streptococcus. The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 21:12, 1158-1160
    CrossRef

  35. 35

    David J Banks, Stephen B Beres, James M Musser. (2002) The fundamental contribution of phages to GAS evolution, genome diversification and strain emergence. Trends in Microbiology 10:11, 515-521
    CrossRef

  36. 36

    D. Felmingham, C. Feldman, W. Hryniewicz, K. Klugman, S. Kohno, D. E. Low, C. Mendes, A. C. Rodloff. (2002) Surveillance of resistance in bacteria causing community-acquired respiratory tract infections. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 8, 12-42
    CrossRef

  37. 37

    K. Loivukene, H.-I. Maaroos, H. Kolk, I. Kull, K. Labotkin, M. Mikelsaar. (2002) Prevalence of antibiotic resistance of Helicobacter pylori isolates in Estonia during 1995-2000 in comparison to the consumption of antibiotics used in treatment regimens. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 8:9, 598-603
    CrossRef

  38. 38

    R. G. Finch, D. E. Low. (2002) A critical assessment of published guidelines and other decision-support systems for the antibiotic treatment of community-acquired respiratory tract infections. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 8, 69-91
    CrossRef

  39. 39

    Martin, Judith M., Green, Michael, Barbadora, Karen A., Wald, Ellen R., . (2002) Erythromycin-Resistant Group A Streptococci in Schoolchildren in Pittsburgh. New England Journal of Medicine 346:16, 1200-1206
    Full Text

  40. 40

    Huovinen, Pentti, . (2002) Macrolide-Resistant Group A Streptococcus — Now in the United States. New England Journal of Medicine 346:16, 1243-1245
    Full Text

  41. 41

    Po-Ren Hsueh, Lee-Jene Teng, Li-Na Lee, Pan-Chyr Yang, Shen-Wu Ho, Hung-Chi Lue, Kwen-Tay Luh. (2002) Increased Prevalence of Erythromycin Resistance in Streptococci: Substantial Upsurge in Erythromycin-Resistant M Phenotype in Streptococcus pyogenes (1979-1998) but Not in Streptococcus pneumoniae (1985-1999) in Taiwan. Microbial Drug Resistance 8:1, 27-33
    CrossRef

  42. 42

    Claudia Zampaloni, Luca A. Vitali, Manuela Prenna, Maria A. Toscano, Gianna Tempera, Sandro Ripa. (2002) Erythromycin Resistance in Italian Isolates of Streptococcus pyogenes and Correlations with Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis Analysis. Microbial Drug Resistance 8:1, 39-44
    CrossRef

  43. 43

    R. Leclercq. (2002) Mechanisms of Resistance to Macrolides and Lincosamides: Nature of the Resistance Elements and Their Clinical Implications. Clinical Infectious Diseases 34:4, 482-492
    CrossRef

  44. 44

    Ian A. Critchley, Daniel F. Sahm, Clyde Thornsberry, Renée S. Blosser-Middleton, Mark E. Jones, James A. Karlowsky. (2002) Antimicrobial susceptibilities of Streptococcus pyogenes isolated from respiratory and skin and soft tissue infections: United States LIBRA surveillance data from 1999. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease 42:2, 129-135
    CrossRef

  45. 45

    José-Marı́a Casellas, Gabriella Tomé, Matı́as Visser, Laura Gliosca. (2002) In vitro activity of the new ketolide ABT-773 against community acquired respiratory tract isolates and Viridans Streptococci. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease 42:2, 107-112
    CrossRef

  46. 46

    Bruna Facinelli, Cinzia Spinaci, Gloria Magi, Eleonora Giovanetti, Pietro E Varaldo. (2001) Association between erythromycin resistance and ability to enter human respiratory cells in group A streptococci. The Lancet 358:9275, 30-33
    CrossRef

  47. 47

    L. Schlegel, B. Merad, H. Rostane, V. Broc, A. Bouvet. (2001) In vitro activity of midecamycin diacetate, a 16-membered macrolide, against Streptococcus pyogenes isolated in France, 1995-1999. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 7:7, 362-366
    CrossRef

  48. 48

    G Rondini, C.E Cocuzza, M Cianflone, A Lanzafame, L Santini, R Mattina. (2001) Bacteriological and clinical efficacy of various antibiotics used in the treatment of streptococcal pharyngitis in Italy. An epidemiological study. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 18:1, 9-17
    CrossRef

  49. 49

    C.M. Brandt, M. Honscha, N.D. Truong, R. Holland, B. Hövener, A. Bryskier, R. Lütticken, R.R. Reinert. (2001) Macrolide Resistance in Streptococcus pyogenes Isolates from Throat Infections in the Region of Aachen, Germany. Microbial Drug Resistance 7:2, 165-170
    CrossRef

  50. 50

    Sandro Ripa, Claudia Zampaloni, Luca Agostino Vitali, Eleonora Giovanetti, Maria Pia Montanari, Manuela Prenna, Pietro Emanuele Varaldo. (2001) Sma I Macrorestriction Analysis of Italian Isolates of Erythromycin-Resistant Streptococcus pyogenes and Correlations with Macrolide-Resistance Phenotypes. Microbial Drug Resistance 7:1, 65-71
    CrossRef

  51. 51

    Jerry M. Zuckerman. (2000) THE NEWER MACROLIDES: AZITHROMYCIN AND CLARITHROMYCIN. Infectious Disease Clinics of North America 14:2, 449-462
    CrossRef

  52. 52

    JULIA Y. MORITA, EMILY KAHN, TERRY THOMPSON, LESLYE LACLAIRE, BERNARD BEALL, GIOVANNI GHERARDI, KATHERINE L. O'BRIEN, BEN SCHWARTZ. (2000) Impact of azithromycin on oropharyngeal carriage of Group A Streptococcus and nasopharyngeal carriage of macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 19:1, 41-46
    CrossRef

  53. 53

    George G. Zhanel, James A. Karlowsky. (1999) Ribosomal resistance: Emerging problems and potential solutions. Current Infectious Disease Reports 1:5, 458-463
    CrossRef

  54. 54

    A Portillo, M Lantero, M.J Gastañares, F Ruiz-Larrea, C Torres. (1999) Macrolide resistance phenotypes and mechanisms of resistance in Streptococcus pyogenes in La Rioja, Spain. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 13:2, 137-140
    CrossRef

  55. 55

    Maria W. Sugeng, Por Ang, Hiok Hee Tan, Chee Leok Goh, From the National Skin Centre, . Singapore. (1999) Characteristics of bacterial skin infections in children compared to adults at a tertiary dermatologic center. International Journal of Dermatology 38:8, 582-586
    CrossRef

  56. 56

    Chen, Danny K., McGeer, Allison, de Azavedo, Joyce C., Low, Donald E., . (1999) Decreased Susceptibility of Streptococcus pneumoniae to Fluoroquinolones in Canada. New England Journal of Medicine 341:4, 233-239
    Full Text

  57. 57

    Salvador Alvarez-Elcoro, Mark J. Enzler. (1999) The Macrolides: Erythromycin, Clarithromycin, and Azithromycin. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 74:6, 613-634
    CrossRef

  58. 58

    Carmen Betriu, M.Carmen Casado, María Gómez, Ana Sanchez, M.Luisa Palau, Juan J Picazo. (1999) Incidence of erythromycin resistance in Streptococcus pyogenes: a 10-year study. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease 33:4, 255-260
    CrossRef

  59. 59

    RonaldN Jones, DonaldE Low, MichaelA Pfaller. (1999) Epidemiologic trends in nosocomial and community-acquired infections due to antibiotic-resistant gram-positive bacteria: the role of streptogramins and other newer compounds. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease 33:2, 101-112
    CrossRef

  60. 60

    Hisanori Akiyama, Osamu Yamasaki, Hiroko Kanzaki, Joji Tada, Jirô Arata. (1999) Streptococci isolated from various skin lesions: the interaction with Staphylococcus aureus strains. Journal of Dermatological Science 19:1, 17-22
    CrossRef

  61. 61

    SH Gillespie. (1998) Failure of penicillin in Streptococcus pyogenes pharyngeal infection. The Lancet 352:9145, 1954-1955
    CrossRef

  62. 62

    David H Spach, Douglas Black. (1998) Antibiotic Resistance in Community-Acquired Respiratory Tract Infections: Current Issues. Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology 81:4, 293-303
    CrossRef

  63. 63

    BEATRIZ ORDEN, EMILIO PEREZ-TRALLERO, MILAGROSA MONTES, ROCÍO MARTÍNEZ. (1998) Erythromycin resistance of Streptococcus pyogenes in Madrid. The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 17:6, 470-473
    CrossRef

  64. 64

    Jun Adachi, Kaoru Endo, Takayuki Fukuzumi, Nobuko Tanigawa, Toshiyuki Aoki. (1998) Increasing incidence of streptococcal impetigo in atopic dermatitis. Journal of Dermatological Science 17:1, 45-53
    CrossRef

  65. 65

    Maria Souli, Christine B. Wennersten, George M. Eliopoulos. (1998) In vitro activity of BAY 12-8039, a new fluoroquinolone, against species representative of respiratory tract pathogens. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 10:1, 23-30
    CrossRef

  66. 66

    Irmgard Kriebernegg, G. Feierl, Andrea Grisold, E. Marth. (1998) In-vitro Susceptibility of Group A Beta-haemolytic Streptococci (GABHS) to Penicillin, Erythromycin, Clarithromycin and Azithromycin in Styria, Austria. Zentralblatt für Bakteriologie 287:1-2, 33-39
    CrossRef

  67. 67

    Horacio A Lopardo, Maria E Venuta, Patricia Vidal, Liliana Rosaenz, Carlos Corthey, Alicia Farinati, Elsa Couto, Beatriz Sarachian, Monica Sparo, Sara Kaufman, Carmen A De Mier, Laura Gubbay, Viviana Scilingo, Patricia Villaverde. (1997) Argentinian collaborative study on prevalence of erythromycin and penicillin susceptibility in Streptococcus pyogenes. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease 29:1, 29-32
    CrossRef

  68. 68

    Seppälä, Helena, Klaukka, Timo, Vuopio-Varkila, Jaana, Muotiala, Anna, Helenius, Hans, Lager, Katrina, Huovinen, Pentti, the Finnish Study Group for Antimicrobial Resistance. (1997) The Effect of Changes in the Consumption of Macrolide Antibiotics on Erythromycin Resistance in Group A Streptococci in Finland. New England Journal of Medicine 337:7, 441-446
    Full Text

  69. 69

    HELENA SEPPÄLÄ, TIMO KLAUKKA, RISTO LEHTONEN, ERKKI NENONEN, PENTTI HUOVINEN. (1997) Erythromycin resistance of group A streptococci from throat samples is related to age. The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 16:7, 651-656
    CrossRef

  70. 70

    James M. Musser. (1997) Streptococcal Superantigen, Mitogenic Factor, and Pyrogenic Exotoxin B Expressed by Streptococcus pyogenes. Preparative Biochemistry and Biotechnology 27:2-3, 143-172
    CrossRef

  71. 71

    Karen C. Carroll, Patricia Monroe, Samuel Cohen, Mark Hoffman, Leslie Hamilton, Kent Korgenski, Larry Reimer, David Classen, Judy Daly. (1997) Susceptibility of beta-hemolytic streptococci to nine antimicrobial agents among four medical centers in Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease 27:4, 123-128
    CrossRef

  72. 72

    GARY L. DARMSTADT. (1997) Oral antibiotic therapy for uncomplicated bacterial skin infections in children. The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 16:2, 227-240
    CrossRef

  73. 73

    Eleonora Giovanetti, Manuela Prenna, Antonella Repetto, Francesca Biavasco, Mario Romagnoli, Sandro Ripa, Pietro E. Varaldo. (1997) Susceptibility of Streptococcus pyogenes from throat cultures to macrolide antibiotics and influence of collection criteria. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 3:1, 58-62
    CrossRef

  74. 74

    CLEMENTINA COCUZZA, GIOVANNA BLANDINO, ROBERTO MATTINA, FERDINANDO NICOLETTI, GIUSEPPE NICOLETTI. (1997) Antibiotic Susceptibility of Group A Streptococci in 2 Italian Cities: Milano and Catania. Microbial Drug Resistance 3:4, 379-384
    CrossRef

  75. 75

    C.E. COCUZZA, R. MATTINA, A. MAZZARIOL, G. OREFICI, R. RESCALDANI, A. PRIMAVERA, S. BRAMATI, G. MASERA, F. PARIZZI, G. CORNAGLIA, R. FONTANA. (1997) High Incidence of Erythromycin-Resistant Streptococcus pyogenes in Monza (North Italy) in Untreated Children With Symptoms of Acute Pharyngo-Tonsillitis: An Epidemiological and Molecular Study. Microbial Drug Resistance 3:4, 371-378
    CrossRef

  76. 76

    Flemming Hald Steffensen, Henrik Carl ønheyder, Henrik toft Ørensen. (1997) High Prescribers of Antibiotics Among General Practitioners-Relation to Prescribing Habits of Other Drugs and Use of Microbiological Diagnostics. Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases 29:4, 409-413
    CrossRef

  77. 77

    D. Adam, H. Scholz, C. Aspe, H. G. Berzel, D. Bulle, H. P. Fritz, V. Grosse, W. Hartmann, R. P. Heil, P. Hirschbrunn, U. Hübschmann-Mehl, J. Just, A. Kielhorn, B. Knauer, L. Maurer, K. Müller, G. Niehaus, D. Onken, W. Raff, J. Reineke, A. Schulze-Buxloh, D. Schumann, M. Steiner, C. Szdzuy, P. Stiphout, M. Weh, H. Winter, P. Wolff, M. Zinke. (1996) Five days of erythromycin estolate versus ten days of penicillin V in the treatment of group a streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis in children. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases 15:9, 712-717
    CrossRef

  78. 78

    Henrik Toft Sørensen, Flemming Hald Steffensen, Henrik C. Schønheyder, Poul Grøn, Svend Sabroe. (1996) Use of Microbiological Diagnostics and Antibiotics in Danish General Practice. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 12:04, 745
    CrossRef

  79. 79

    A. F. Kürekçi, M. Baysallar, A. Karaarslan, G. Emekda§, V. Köseoĝlu, R. Akin, O. Özcan. (1996) The frequency of resistance to erythromycin in group A streptococci in Ankara. European Journal of Pediatrics 155:9, 780-782
    CrossRef

  80. 80

    ROBERT COHEN, CORINNE LEVY, CATHERINE DOIT, FRANCE DE LA ROCQUE, MICHEL BOUCHERAT, FREDERIC FITOUSSI, JACQUES LANGUE, EDOUARD BINGEN. (1996) Six-day amoxicillin vs. ten-day penicillin V therapy for group A streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis. The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 15:8, 678-682
    CrossRef

  81. 81

    A. Bauernfeind. (1996) Author's concluding statement. Infection 24:3, 270-271
    CrossRef

  82. 82

    Gilat Livni, Shai Ashkenazi, Leonard Leibovici, Silvio Pitlik, Bruria Lev, Hana Konisberger, Zmira Samra, Moshe Drucker. (1996) Incidence and Severity of Group a Streptococcal Bacteremia in a Medical Center in Israel, 1981–1994. Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases 28:2, 139-142
    CrossRef

  83. 83

    Shan-Chwen Chang, Yee-Chun Chen, Kwen-Tay Luh, Wei-Chuan Hsieh. (1995) Macrolides resistance of common bacteria isolated from Taiwan. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease 23:4, 147-154
    CrossRef

  84. 84

    Helinä Järvinen, Kaisu Pienihäkkinen, Pentti Huovinen, Jorma Tenovuo. (1995) Susceptibility of Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sobrinus to antimicrobial agents after short-term oral chlorhexidine treatments. European Journal of Oral Sciences 103:1, 32-35
    CrossRef

  85. 85

    CLAES Schalen, DANIEL Gebreselassie, STEN StÅHl. (1995) Characterization of an erythromycin resistance (erm) plasmid in Streptococcus pyogenes. APMIS 103:1-6, 59-68
    CrossRef

  86. 86

    EMILIO BOUZA, PATRICIA MUÑOZ. (1995) Penicillin-Resistant Pneumococci in Adult Disease with Special Reference to AIDS Patients. Microbial Drug Resistance 1:1, 9-28
    CrossRef

  87. 87

    Antti Nissinen, Helena Seppålå, Pentti Huovinen. (1995) Detecting Erythromycin Resistance in Streptococcus pyogenes: Reliability of the Disk Diffusion Method and the Breakpoint Susceptibility Testing Method. Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases 27:1, 52-56
    CrossRef

  88. 88

    MICHAEL E. PICHICHERO. (1995) Activity of the Newer Oral Extended-Spectrum Antimicrobials against Resistant Respiratory Pathogens. Pediatric Asthma, Allergy & Immunology 9:3, 143-155
    CrossRef

  89. 89

    A. Chibante, E. Peixoto, R. Lejeune, K. Winter, M. Kissling. (1994) Clinical efficacy and safety of cefetamet pivoxil in toddlers. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 4:3, 203-210
    CrossRef

  90. 90

    Pia Pini. (1994) Superbug stars in media-made epidemic. The Lancet 343:8910, 1376-1377
    CrossRef

  91. 91

    Arne Orrling, Anna Stjernquist-Desatnik, Claes Schalén, Carl Kamme. (1994) Clindamycin in Persisting Streptococcal Pharyngotonsillitis after Penicillin Treatment. Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases 26:5, 535-541
    CrossRef

  92. 92

    ARNE Forsgren, MATS Walder. (1994) Antimicrobial susceotibilirv of bacterial isolates in South Sweden including a 13-year follow-up study of some respiratory tract pathogens. APMIS 102:1-6, 227-235
    CrossRef

  93. 93

    Lasse Lehtonen, Pentti Huovinen. (1993) Susceptibility of Respiratory Tract Pathogens in Finland to Cefixime and Nine Other Antimicrobial Agents. Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases 25:3, 373-378
    CrossRef

  94. 94

    W. Tewodros, L. Muhe, E. Daniel, C. Schalén, G. Kronvall. (1992) A one-year study of streptococcal infections and their complications among Ethiopian children. Epidemiology and Infection 109:02, 211
    CrossRef

  95. 95

    MarkH. Wilcox, TrevorG. Winstanley, RobertC. Spencer, C.W. Ian Douglas. (1992) Susceptibility of endocarditis streptococci to clindamycin. The Lancet 340:8826, 1036
    CrossRef

  96. 96

    O'Brien, Thomas F., . (1992) Global Surveillance of Antibiotic Resistance. New England Journal of Medicine 326:5, 339-340
    Full Text